2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-012-9342-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory-generating design science research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars promote cross-fertilisation of DSR with action research for evaluating artefacts in an organisational context (Sein, Henfridsson, Purao, Rossi, & Lindgren, 2011) and to improve theoretical abstraction and knowledge generation from DSR. Beck, Weber, and Gregory (2013) suggest that the latter goal is achieved through the critical reflection and learning steps of action research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars promote cross-fertilisation of DSR with action research for evaluating artefacts in an organisational context (Sein, Henfridsson, Purao, Rossi, & Lindgren, 2011) and to improve theoretical abstraction and knowledge generation from DSR. Beck, Weber, and Gregory (2013) suggest that the latter goal is achieved through the critical reflection and learning steps of action research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I also argue, in line with [57], that prescriptions are not the onlyand perhaps not a sufficient theoretical outcome of socio-technical design science research. Furthermore, it can be argued that the problem can never be known beforehand, but is instead iteratively understood as the development of an artifact unfolds, similar to the reasoning by [11], [12]. By designing the problem beforehand and then performing evaluations that match the initial problem understanding, knowledge is reduced to recipes rather than meals and ingredients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1], [2]) or theory output (e.g. [11], [12]) differs. DSR is thereby regarded as relying on an iterative process that contains three main parts: defining or finding a problem to solve, designing an IT/IS artifact that solve the problem, and evaluation to prove that the artifact did in fact improve status quo (e.g.…”
Section: Design Science Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Design Research (DR) is a research paradigm that deals with human problems through creating innovative artifacts (Beck, Weber and Gregory 2013), the result contributing knowledge to understand human problems (Hevner and Chatterjee 2010). It aims to create new and innovative artifacts consisting of constructs, models, methods and instantiations (Hevner et al 2004;March and Smith 1995).…”
Section: Action Research (Ar) -Design Research (Dr) -Ethnographic Resmentioning
confidence: 99%