1998
DOI: 10.3109/10826089809115858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory: Foundations of Artificial Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not a semantic issue. Using linear models/tools to study non-linear processes/phenomena can and does result in misleading conclusions and can therefore also result in inappropriate intervention (Buscema, 1998 taking among MSM has become well documented in numerous behavioral studies. The findings suggest ".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a semantic issue. Using linear models/tools to study non-linear processes/phenomena can and does result in misleading conclusions and can therefore also result in inappropriate intervention (Buscema, 1998 taking among MSM has become well documented in numerous behavioral studies. The findings suggest ".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a relatively unusual and sophisticated inferential technique such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) is motivated by the fact that the underlying relation to be estimated among our independent sample variables and the dependent variable (the PGWB total score) is extremely complex and there is no reliable a-priori statistical model to refer to. ANNs self-adjust their structure as they learn from their own errors, and can handle simultaneously a very high number of variables, irrespectively of their underlying degree of non-linearity, and this leads to structurally robust results even when the underlying statistical process is not well understood, thereby allowing to cope with many sources of inferential inaccuracy such as outliers, collinear interactions among variables, hidden variables, and so on (Buscema 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the cross-sectional 1712 Pallesen et al design employed in the present study does not enable us to draw any conclusion about causality between anabolic steroid use and depression. In addition, depression is clearly a multidimensional construct and may be related to other phenomena in a nonlinear fashion (see Buscema, 1998). As it has been hypothesized that poor as well as good health behavior may be spread in a local environment by so-called early adopters who have picked up on the behavior from media and other sources acting as a role model (Bandura, 1986), we wanted to estimate the proportion of adolescents who actually had at least one acquaintance that used or had used anabolic steroids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%