“…Overall, more than 80% of the questions asked by interviewers were focused, and only 6% were open-ended and allowed free recall of the abuse. These results have been consistently replicated in several countries, including Australia, Canada, Finland, Great Britain, Israel, Norway, Sweden, and the United States (Aldridge & Cameron, 1999;Cederborg, Orbach, Sternberg, & Lamb, 2000;Cyr & Lamb, 2009;Faller, 1996;Korkman, Santtila, Westeraker, & Sandnabba, 2008;Lamb et al, 2009;Orbach et al, 2000;Myklebust & Bjorklund, 2010;Sternberg, Lamb, Davies, & Westcott, 2001;Thoresen, Kyrre, Melinder, Stridbeck, & Magnussen, 2006). Although a recent study (Thoresen, Lonnum, Melinder, & Magnussen, 2009) has observed some changes in the quality of Norwegian forensic interviews over a period of 10 years (1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), including a decrease in leading questions, the number of open-ended questions remained low throughout the interview, suggesting that interviewers continued to rely, to a large extent, on closed questioning.…”