2016
DOI: 10.1109/jqe.2015.2507590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and Optimization of 1.3- $\mu \text{m}$ Metamorphic Quantum Well Lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been motivated by the superior properties of GaAs, as well as the potential to exploit vertical-cavity architectures. While these approaches have enjoyed some success, their associated limitations have prevented widespread adoption for practical applications: the development of QD devices has been constrained by the difficulty to grow uniform, high density QDs, while metamorphic and dilute nitride devices suffer from defect-related recombination and are largely limited to wavelengths ≲1.55 μ m 13 14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been motivated by the superior properties of GaAs, as well as the potential to exploit vertical-cavity architectures. While these approaches have enjoyed some success, their associated limitations have prevented widespread adoption for practical applications: the development of QD devices has been constrained by the difficulty to grow uniform, high density QDs, while metamorphic and dilute nitride devices suffer from defect-related recombination and are largely limited to wavelengths ≲1.55 μ m 13 14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that significant reductions in J th can be expected to result from refinements in the growth of metamorphic heterostructures, but at the cost of also reducing T 0 . Our analysis also indicates that optimised 1.3 and 1.55 µm lasers grown on InGaAs MBLs require a small number of QWs, typically 3, which is lower by approximately a factor of two than the number required in InP-based devices operating at the same wavelengths [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Secondly, we have (i) calculated the properties of a series of 1.3 and 1.55 µm metamorphic laser structures, and (ii) identified optimised laser structures having low J th and high dg dn . Our calculations indicate that optimised metamorphic laser structures have the potential to offer (i) threshold current densities (differential gains) which are lower (higher) than those than can be obtained in InP-based devices at the same wavelengths, and (ii) high differential gains equivalent to those that one would expect to obtain in InGaAs QWs grown on GaAs substrates [5]. Further analysis has indicated that the performance of these laser structures is, in part, governed by a trade-off between the carrier and optical confinement, which can be engineered in order to optimise the threshold characteristics through incorporation of Al in the barrier layers to form structures consisting of compressively strained InGaAs QWs and quaternary AlInGaAs barriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations