1987
DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and delivery of health programming in the community: The Pawtucket Heart Health Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 A number of communitylevel research and demonstration intervention projects were initiated during this period, including the North Karelia Project in Finland, 2 the Stanford Three Community Study, 3 the Stanford Five City Project, 4 the Minnesota Heart Health Program, 5 the Pawtucket Program, 6 and the Heartbeat Wales Program. 7 Although the results were mixed, these projects have demonstrated that community-level interventions can be effective in reducing risk factor levels in populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A number of communitylevel research and demonstration intervention projects were initiated during this period, including the North Karelia Project in Finland, 2 the Stanford Three Community Study, 3 the Stanford Five City Project, 4 the Minnesota Heart Health Program, 5 the Pawtucket Program, 6 and the Heartbeat Wales Program. 7 Although the results were mixed, these projects have demonstrated that community-level interventions can be effective in reducing risk factor levels in populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Evaluations ofcommunity prevention programs conducted to date have focused mainly on assessing outcomes (e.g., changes in health behavior) and on documenting program output. Much less em-phasis has been placed on analyzing the process of program implementation, particularly where this process has involved community organization activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il ne faut pas sous-estimer l'importance du manque de ressources que les organismes peuvent consacrer à des finalités de santé (quelle que soit la problématique) dans leur choix de ne pas s'engager dans des projets tels les Groupes d'action. Comparativement, dans des communautés qui n'affichent pas un si grand déficit dans leurs ressources, des expé-riences semblables (Lefebvre et al, 1987) ont réussi à rallier des partenaires et à produire des effets.…”
Section: La Réalisation Des Activitésunclassified