2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorizing MNE-NGO conflicts in state-capitalist contexts: Insights from the Greenpeace, Gazprom and the Russian state dispute in the Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar conflicts may emerge when MNEs from state-capitalist economies meet global NGOs at the supranational level . Villo, Halme, and Ritvala ( 2020 ) use the Arctic oil drilling dispute between environmental NGOs headed by Greenpeace and Gazprom, the Russian energy giant, to highlight the conflicts between domestic political stakeholders and global social stakeholders. They theorize that MNE–NGO–state conflict escalation can have perverse effects, in that MNEs headquartered in state capitalist economies receive strong government support and are found less susceptible than developed countries to NGOs’ environmental demands, but that this protection results in negligence toward the activist-contested environmental risks.…”
Section: Charting the Influence Of Nonmarket Strategy Research: Analytical Framework Citation Analyses And Critical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar conflicts may emerge when MNEs from state-capitalist economies meet global NGOs at the supranational level . Villo, Halme, and Ritvala ( 2020 ) use the Arctic oil drilling dispute between environmental NGOs headed by Greenpeace and Gazprom, the Russian energy giant, to highlight the conflicts between domestic political stakeholders and global social stakeholders. They theorize that MNE–NGO–state conflict escalation can have perverse effects, in that MNEs headquartered in state capitalist economies receive strong government support and are found less susceptible than developed countries to NGOs’ environmental demands, but that this protection results in negligence toward the activist-contested environmental risks.…”
Section: Charting the Influence Of Nonmarket Strategy Research: Analytical Framework Citation Analyses And Critical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MNEs are seen as the cause, through the dark side of their activities such as environmental degradation, corruption, and exploitation (e.g., Batra, 2007;Michailova, Stringer, & Mezias, 2020;Villo, Halme, & Ritvala, 2020), as well as the solution of problems that undermine sustainable development. As Kolk and Van Tulder (2010, p. 120) contended, the "absence of widespread international regulation on social and environmental issues can be considered as both a problem and an opportunity for MNEs."…”
Section: Sustainable Development and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGOs are key actors that influence the industrial rules-of-game and accordingly shape MNEs’ global business practices ( Teegen, Doh, & Vachani, 2004 ). They also play a crucial role to strongly orient public opinion by raising awareness and conflicts against unethical MNEs ( Villo, Halme, & Ritvala, 2020 ). In fast-fashion industry, where people urge SSR improvements, NGOs claim the high moral ground for their role to inspect the SSR practice adopted by MNEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%