2002
DOI: 10.2307/3069285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

38
1,916
7
109

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,135 publications
(2,070 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
38
1,916
7
109
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutionalization of novel practices in an emerging field is a complex affair (Greenwood, Suddaby and Hinings 2002). Proto-institutions acquire legitimacy only when they are recognized as proper social objects, becoming taken-for-granted (Berger and Luckman, 1967;Haveman, Rao and Paruchuri 2007) and therefore the normatively appropriate thing-to-do (Meyer and Rowan 1977).…”
Section: The Emergence Of Institutions and The Role Of Analogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Institutionalization of novel practices in an emerging field is a complex affair (Greenwood, Suddaby and Hinings 2002). Proto-institutions acquire legitimacy only when they are recognized as proper social objects, becoming taken-for-granted (Berger and Luckman, 1967;Haveman, Rao and Paruchuri 2007) and therefore the normatively appropriate thing-to-do (Meyer and Rowan 1977).…”
Section: The Emergence Of Institutions and The Role Of Analogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenwood et al 2002), but is even more difficult in emerging institutional fields where field boundaries, membership and structure are still in flux (Aldrich and Fiol 1994;Maguire et al 2004). Even in emerging fields, though, institutionalization does not operate in a vacuum; the institutional landscape is filled with institutional "parts" that institutional entrepreneurs can recombine to develop novel institutions (Lounsbury, 2007;Schneiberg, 2007;Stark, 1996).…”
Section: The Emergence Of Institutions and The Role Of Analogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como apontam Deephouse e Suchman (2008), existem termos alternativos à ideia de objeto: Ruef e Scott (1998) o definem como nível, Suchman (1995) como foco e eles próprios o colocam como sujeito. Segundo Deephouse e Suchman (2008), o termo sujeito é mais adequado por ser comum, por refletir a ideia de que a legitimidade é socialmente construída, por lembrar que ela pode ter uma natureza subjetiva e, por fim, que tais objetos não são necessariamente passivos, mas, ao invés disso, podem gerar legitimidade (vide ASHFORTH; GIBBS, 1990;HININGS, 2002;SUCHMAN, 1995). Contudo, mesmo diante dos argumentos dos autores, preferimos usar o termo objeto por ele já ser visto como definição nas teorias sobre legitimidade (vide JOHNSON; DOWD; RIDGEWAY, 2006), e não remeter ao cará-ter voluntarista que Suchman (1995) tenta enfatizar (para críticas, vide CRUBELLATE; PASCUCCI; GRAVE, 2008;TEIXEIRA, 2008).…”
Section: Níveis Objetos E Origens Da Legitimidade Organizacionalunclassified
“…Finally, the third determinant of institutional entrepreneurship is the structure of the existing institutional field, connected to the collective organization of wedding planners. Here, the existence of an association is recognized as playing an important role in the emergence of innovations that diverge from the dominant practice (Greenwood, Suddaby, & Hinings, 2002). In addition, the presence of other relevant actors is an integral part of the structure of the existing field.…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%