2020
DOI: 10.1380/ejssnt.2020.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Study on C Adsorbate at Graphene/Cu(111) or h-BN/Cu(111) Interfaces

Abstract: To elucidate bottom-up fabrication of heterostructures of two-dimensional materials such as graphene and h-BN, C atom adsorption on Cu(111) surface partially covered with h-BN or graphene is studied by using the first-principles method with van der Waals correction. It is found that the C monomer more difficultly locates under h-BN than under graphene or on bare Cu, while the C monomer also more hardly diffuses under graphene than under h-BN or on bare Cu. In addition, formation of C dimers is more difficult u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We are unaware of any theoretical studies of C atom adsorption at the interface of GTL with the Cu–Ni(111) catalyst. However, Kageshima et al have calculated the adsorption energy of the C monomer at the interface of GTL with the Cu(111) catalyst and obtained a minimum adsorption energy of −2.67 eV . This adsorption energy is higher than that of the Cu–Ni(111) catalyst obtained in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are unaware of any theoretical studies of C atom adsorption at the interface of GTL with the Cu–Ni(111) catalyst. However, Kageshima et al have calculated the adsorption energy of the C monomer at the interface of GTL with the Cu(111) catalyst and obtained a minimum adsorption energy of −2.67 eV . This adsorption energy is higher than that of the Cu–Ni(111) catalyst obtained in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…However, Kageshima et al have calculated the adsorption energy of the C monomer at the interface of GTL with the Cu(111) catalyst and obtained a minimum adsorption energy of −2.67 eV. 63 This adsorption energy is higher than that of the Cu−Ni(111) catalyst obtained in this study. This result is acceptable because our previous study showed that alloying with Ni atoms can reduce the adsorption energy of the C monomer on the surface of the Cu(111) catalyst.…”
Section: Segregation and Diffusion Into Processes Of C Adatomscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Monolayer hBN was first grown on the Cu catalyst at 1040 °C by the decomposition of ammonia borane. The edge of hBN tends to attach to the Cu surface, presenting a metal-passivated state, which blocks the diffusion of active species underneath hBN. The hBN/Cu was then cooled to 900 °C for hydrogen annealing. In a hydrogen-rich environment, the edge of hBN detaches from the Cu surface and is terminated by H. The detached hBN exhibits a weaker interaction with the Cu catalyst and thereby a lower diffusion barrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride Cu(111). We also put a H atom on the H3 site, which is the 154 most stable site according to our previous study [21]. Among the methods, there are DF1 [27] and DF2 [28] depending on the version of vdW-DF, while DF2 is the revised version.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%