1967
DOI: 10.1021/ja01000a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical calculations of thermodynamic functions of solvation of ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dipole moment of a molecule in the liquid differs from that measured in the vapor phase (Millen and Watts, 1967) due to the induction of an additional moment by the dipole field of its neighbors. Thus, in the interlayer environment of the cation and the amide, the effective dipole moment of the amide may be greater than that determined in the vapor phase (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dipole moment of a molecule in the liquid differs from that measured in the vapor phase (Millen and Watts, 1967) due to the induction of an additional moment by the dipole field of its neighbors. Thus, in the interlayer environment of the cation and the amide, the effective dipole moment of the amide may be greater than that determined in the vapor phase (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Millen and Watts (1967) have discussed the relative permittivity of the solvation layers of an ion as a function of distance from the ion and suggest that the region of dielectric saturation is less for a monovalent ion than a divalent ion and as indicated above, Norrish (1954) has attributed differences in the swelling of montmorillonite in water to this cause. An alternative statement is that the relative permittivity in the interlayer spaces for Na-montmorillonite approaches more closely that of the bulk liquid water than Ca-or Mg-montmorillonite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bernal and Fowler (1933) treated the interaction energy of ions and the molecules of the salvation sheath as ion-dipole interactions. They also considered the loss of energy involved in rearranging the solvent molecules around the ion; a consideration similar to that of Millen and Watts (1967), who calculated the energy required to create a hole in the solvent matrix large enough to accommodate the ion.…”
Section: +4 T----mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermodynamic functions of solvation of ions have been calculated theoretically [336] using a modification of the Born approach.…”
Section: 30mentioning
confidence: 99%