2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical approach of a flat-plate solar collector taking into account the absorption and emission within glass cover layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different researchers have studied the using of various categories of solar dryers for the drying characteristics of different vegetables and fruits. According to Karna & Koo, 2017;Khoukhi & Maruyama, 2006;Kong, Lin, & Li, 2013; they reported the 26.25 W/m 2 for convective heat transfer coefficient of asparagus sample under the sun-drying condition. Other studies (Kumar, Khatak, Sahdev, & Prakash, 2011;Kumar, Sansaniwal, & Khatak, 2015;Kumar & Tiwari, 2009) have been reported that drying rate under the hybrid dryer was greater than sun-drying with the efficiency of 15% during the summer season.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different researchers have studied the using of various categories of solar dryers for the drying characteristics of different vegetables and fruits. According to Karna & Koo, 2017;Khoukhi & Maruyama, 2006;Kong, Lin, & Li, 2013; they reported the 26.25 W/m 2 for convective heat transfer coefficient of asparagus sample under the sun-drying condition. Other studies (Kumar, Khatak, Sahdev, & Prakash, 2011;Kumar, Sansaniwal, & Khatak, 2015;Kumar & Tiwari, 2009) have been reported that drying rate under the hybrid dryer was greater than sun-drying with the efficiency of 15% during the summer season.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, accurate prediction of the thermal performance of solar collector system strongly depends on how the glass cover material is analysed. Though almost all the studies reported assume that glass cover of a system is transparent for the solar range and opaque for the infrared radiation [27], only few studies have reported on the influence of thickness of glazing materials on the performance of solar collector.…”
Section: Influence Of Cover Materials On the Collector Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the glass thickness can clearly be depicted in Figure 7, whereby collector with 6 mm thickness gave poor performance, while 4 mm thickness gave the best performance. Khoukhi et al [27] reported that, on increasing the thickness of the glass cover from 3 mm to 6 mm, the steady heat flux through the cover decreases and, therefore, thinner glass (3 mm) is more suitable with regard to the cost and the weight of the solar collector system when compared to 6 mm thickness. These results also support the conclusion given by Vejen et al [29] who outlines good selection of glazing materials as one of the factors that can improve the performance of solar collector.…”
Section: Temperature and Energy Profile Of Collectors With Different mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reection and absorption of the glass cover can affect the performance of the solar thermal system. [7][8][9] The coverings made of glass have refractive index of 1.5, which reect 8% of normally incident light on air/glass interface and degrade the performance of the solar thermal system. 10 In addition, the dust accumulations on the surface also affect the performance of solar thermal system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%