2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijil.2016.079068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and some practical perspectives on age diversity and comparative age management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting CSR initiative in the context of age management is the European CSR Europe project called "A New Perspective on Careers: How to Cope with Prolonging Active Working Lives" with the ambition to seek and promote examples of innovation that will help companies to employ people throughout their entire career in the long term. It is also important to note that CSR Europe, in collaboration with member organisations, has provided a tool to measure Age Management -LEA (Galic et al, 2019;Chand and Markova, 2019), which enables to measure, evaluate and map key human resource development processes in the area of age management (Principi and Fabbietti, 2015;Kosir and Soba, 2016;Urbancová and Hudáková, 2017). With LEA, employers get a credible picture of what measures, tools and processes need to be implemented.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting CSR initiative in the context of age management is the European CSR Europe project called "A New Perspective on Careers: How to Cope with Prolonging Active Working Lives" with the ambition to seek and promote examples of innovation that will help companies to employ people throughout their entire career in the long term. It is also important to note that CSR Europe, in collaboration with member organisations, has provided a tool to measure Age Management -LEA (Galic et al, 2019;Chand and Markova, 2019), which enables to measure, evaluate and map key human resource development processes in the area of age management (Principi and Fabbietti, 2015;Kosir and Soba, 2016;Urbancová and Hudáková, 2017). With LEA, employers get a credible picture of what measures, tools and processes need to be implemented.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- Source: Dwyer and Azevedo (2016, p.284);Guérin-Marion, Manion, and Parsons (2018, p.52) Several scholars try to present the conceptual framework of intergenerational learning by defining the process and bringing forward several typologies (Babnik & Širca, 2014;Baily, 2009;Kosir & Soba, 2016;Pauget & Chauvel, 2018;Sprinkle & Urick, 2018) while others concentrate on analyzing how and why is intergenerational learning occurring in the organizational environment (Harvey, 2012;Kuyken, Ebrahimi, & Saives, 2018;Urick, 2017;Ypsilanti, Vivas, Räisänen, Viitala, Ijäs, & Ropes, 2014). The former describes intergenerational learning as an unconscious process and makes the distinction among four types of intergenerational learning, taking into account the form of interaction and the type of content that is shared; according to Brucknerova and Novotny (2017), the main Intergenerational Learning -a Topic of Discussion or a Reality?…”
Section: Table 1 Comparative Analysis Of the Baby Boomers Generation ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It takes into account the current demographic conditions and age categories of employees in order to fulfil the organization's goals [9], [10], [11]. The decision whether to apply diversity or directly age management is the responsibility of individual organizations with regard to demographic development and the current situation on the labour market, as well as migration [8], [12]. At the same time, age affects the willingness to adopt new technologies [13], [14], which plays a significant role in a digitizationdependent era.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%