1992
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(92)87111-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental aspects of indirect detection in capillary electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature system peaks are often referred to [6][7][8][9][10] although the concept of system peaks is scarcely defined and authors apply the term differently. Disturbances in the basic signal of a detector can be caused by a variety of effects.…”
Section: What Can Be Understood By the Term System Peaks ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature system peaks are often referred to [6][7][8][9][10] although the concept of system peaks is scarcely defined and authors apply the term differently. Disturbances in the basic signal of a detector can be caused by a variety of effects.…”
Section: What Can Be Understood By the Term System Peaks ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ion is not always present in systems designed for indirect detection. 'This is the case when the BGE only consists of the marker and a counter ion, when only a system peak corresponding to the electroosmotic flow is visible [7,18,201. More complex BGEs give additional system peaks with mobilities determined by the composition of the BGE [5,20].…”
Section: Indirect Response Profilementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was first of all due to less band broadening from Joule heating effects and secondly, less peak deformation caused by concentration overloading effects. The latter is considered to be directly proportional to the sample/BGE concentration ratio [18]. Consequently, the detection sensitivity was improved significantly by using the 25 pm ID capillary.…”
Section: Separation Of Sugars In Two Capillaries Of Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations