1975
DOI: 10.1080/00797308.1975.11823306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and Clinical Aspects of Ambivalence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychoanalytic writings offer several provocative ideas about this sort of ambivalence. Holder's (1975) review of Sigmund Freud's work describes several phases in the latter's thinking about ambivalence. For ex.ample, Holder (1975) asserts that Freud's late writings characterized ambivaleiice as conflict arising from incomplete "fusion" or "integration" of love, which is a manifestation of the sexual drive, and hate, which is a manifestation of the aggression drive.…”
Section: The Ambivalence Of Contradictory Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Psychoanalytic writings offer several provocative ideas about this sort of ambivalence. Holder's (1975) review of Sigmund Freud's work describes several phases in the latter's thinking about ambivalence. For ex.ample, Holder (1975) asserts that Freud's late writings characterized ambivaleiice as conflict arising from incomplete "fusion" or "integration" of love, which is a manifestation of the sexual drive, and hate, which is a manifestation of the aggression drive.…”
Section: The Ambivalence Of Contradictory Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holder's (1975) review of Sigmund Freud's work describes several phases in the latter's thinking about ambivalence. For ex.ample, Holder (1975) asserts that Freud's late writings characterized ambivaleiice as conflict arising from incomplete "fusion" or "integration" of love, which is a manifestation of the sexual drive, and hate, which is a manifestation of the aggression drive. By comparison, Kris (1984) espouses a broader psychoanalytic view, arguing that the essence of conflicts of ambivalence is the divergence of opposing components of an object: the co-presence of antithetical pairs of qualities.…”
Section: The Ambivalence Of Contradictory Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would be the case if there were an emotive-affective relation to one object alone which represented the whole object world. As Abraham (1982), Akhtar (1994), Bios & GalatzerLevy ( 1987), Blum ( 1983), Brierley ( 1936), Anna Freud (1945), Holder (1975, Melanie Klein (1935), Rangell ( 1982), Stolorow & Lachmann ( 1978) have assumed, it seems that in this case, the only option the child has to resolve its ambivalence is to split the primary object up into a primitive idealized part object and an aggressive part object, projecting its own aggressions onto that aggressive part object. These are the conditions under which the child can develop the illusion that the idealized part object will protect him/her from the aggressive part object.…”
Section: Splitting-the End-product Of Other Defensive Operationsmentioning
confidence: 94%