2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The zero-leverage phenomenon: A bivariate probit with partial observability approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
22
0
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
22
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It also comprises a relatively balanced number of firm-year observations between countries with market-and bank-based financial systems and covers the whole period of the most recent banking crises and sovereign debt crises in Europe, which, for some countries, according to Laeven andValencia (2018), went until 2012. This article contributes in several ways to the literature. Confirming previous evidence (Bessler et al, 2013;Morais et al, 2020), our results show that also at the European level there are two types of zero-leverage firms: financially constrained firms that are unable to get any funding; and financially unconstrained firms, which maintain zero leverage by choice. Also, similarly to Ghoul et al (2018), we confirm that the financial system prevailing in the country, as well as the level of stock market development, are important determinants of zero leverage, with firms in countries with market-based systems being more prone to be unlevered.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It also comprises a relatively balanced number of firm-year observations between countries with market-and bank-based financial systems and covers the whole period of the most recent banking crises and sovereign debt crises in Europe, which, for some countries, according to Laeven andValencia (2018), went until 2012. This article contributes in several ways to the literature. Confirming previous evidence (Bessler et al, 2013;Morais et al, 2020), our results show that also at the European level there are two types of zero-leverage firms: financially constrained firms that are unable to get any funding; and financially unconstrained firms, which maintain zero leverage by choice. Also, similarly to Ghoul et al (2018), we confirm that the financial system prevailing in the country, as well as the level of stock market development, are important determinants of zero leverage, with firms in countries with market-based systems being more prone to be unlevered.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, similarly to Ghoul et al (2018), we confirm that the financial system prevailing in the country, as well as the level of stock market development, are important determinants of zero leverage, with firms in countries with market-based systems being more prone to be unlevered. In addition, we show that the recent finding by Morais et al (2020) that the European financial and sovereign debt crises increased the propensity for zero leverage, actually is only valid for market-based countries, since no significant changes occurred in bank-based countries. Another novel result uncovered by our study is the fact that the relevance of the financial flexibility hypothesis is higher in market-based systems and that, contrary to what could be expected, the financial constraints approach did not gain importance with the 2008 crisis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, because of the heteroscedastic nature of the microeconomic data in bivariate probit models [83], we controlled for heteroscedasticity via the inclusion of robust standard errors. Second, the in/exclusion and/or change of explanatory variables did not alter the outcomes significantly, indicating a robust model, see Morais et al [85], which included alternative country-specific variables as a robustness test. Third, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) tests for multicollinearity [86].…”
Section: Examining Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 91%