2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Yoruba version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale: psychometric characteristics and correlates of hopelessness in a sample of Nigerian psychiatric outpatients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Los resultados del presente estudio coincidieron con lo reportado por Beck et al (1974;α =.93) y Zhang et al (2015;α = .95) quienes trabajaron con pacientes con intento suicida, y con Chang et al (1994;ω = .95), Steed (2001;α = .88, Aloba et al (2018;α = .87), Hanna et al (2011;87) y Aloba et al (2016) (α = .87) con universitarios y con Szabó et al (2016) en población clínica psiquiátrica (α = .89). De este modo, se observó que los resultados también coincidían con lo reportado por Aloba et al (2015) en población clínica psiquiátrica (α = .92), y con Zhang et al (2015;α = .90), Satorres et al (2016;α = .93) y Kao et al (2012;α = .85), en población general. No obstante, los resultados del presente estudio difieren de los publicados por Gonzales-Huerta et al (2013) con población clínica no psiquiátrica (α = .73), Aloba et al (2016) en cuidadores familiares de pacientes psiquiátricos (α = .72), Kocalevent et al (2016) en población general (α = .81), Pompili et al (2007;α = .73) y González (2009;α = .83) en universitarios.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Los resultados del presente estudio coincidieron con lo reportado por Beck et al (1974;α =.93) y Zhang et al (2015;α = .95) quienes trabajaron con pacientes con intento suicida, y con Chang et al (1994;ω = .95), Steed (2001;α = .88, Aloba et al (2018;α = .87), Hanna et al (2011;87) y Aloba et al (2016) (α = .87) con universitarios y con Szabó et al (2016) en población clínica psiquiátrica (α = .89). De este modo, se observó que los resultados también coincidían con lo reportado por Aloba et al (2015) en población clínica psiquiátrica (α = .92), y con Zhang et al (2015;α = .90), Satorres et al (2016;α = .93) y Kao et al (2012;α = .85), en población general. No obstante, los resultados del presente estudio difieren de los publicados por Gonzales-Huerta et al (2013) con población clínica no psiquiátrica (α = .73), Aloba et al (2016) en cuidadores familiares de pacientes psiquiátricos (α = .72), Kocalevent et al (2016) en población general (α = .81), Pompili et al (2007;α = .73) y González (2009;α = .83) en universitarios.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La fiabilidad y la validez de la BHS han sido cuestionadas por más de 40 años. Como resultado, se han referido diversas estructuras factoriales: un factor, en sujetos con depresión (Young, Halper, Clark, Scheftner, y Fawcett, 1992), y en estudiantes de primaria y secundaria (Kagotho, Bowen, Ssewamala, Vaughn, y Kirkbride, 2018); dos factores relacionados, en población con esquizofrenia (Kao, Liu, y Lu, 2012), depresión (Dyce, 1996), cáncer (Nissim et al, 2010;Spangenberg et al, 2016), cuidadores de pacientes psiquiátricos (Aloba, Ajao, Alimi, y Esan, 2016), y en población general (Satorres et al, 2016); tres factores, en participantes con bipolaridad, esquizofrenia, depresión, intento suicidio (Aloba et al, 2015), ansiedad (Steer, Beck, y Brown, 1997), abuso de sustancias (Steer, Iguchi, y Platt, 1994), y con población general (Iliceto y Fino, 2015;Kocalevent et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…It was suggested that the Cronbach alpha coefficient can be used to test reliability of scales that have binary (true/false) items (Cronbach, ), and this method is used frequently (e.g. Aloba et al, ; Nissim et al, ; Troister, D'Agata & Holden, ). Therefore, in the present study, to test reliability, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was calculated and it was found to be 0.79.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decided to label the factors as “negative cognition regarding the future (Factor 1)” and “negative expectations regarding the future (Factor 2).” The scale's developers utilizing principal component analysis as the factorial structure extraction method in their original study involving 294 individuals who had previously attempted suicide yielded a model with three factors namely “feeling about the future,” “loss of motivation,” and “future expectations.”[25] Among all, the previous studies that had examined the factor structure of the BHS, none had been able to replicate a factor model structure that is exactly similar to what was described by the scale's developers either in terms of the number of factors or the items constituting the factors. [45] The lack of specificity or exactness regarding the factor structure of the BHS in both patients and nonclinical population has been previously described. [46] In the context of patients’ population, a three-factor BHS model has been advanced to be the most applicable,[47] an observation that has been recently reported among Nigerian patients with psychiatric disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46] In the context of patients’ population, a three-factor BHS model has been advanced to be the most applicable,[47] an observation that has been recently reported among Nigerian patients with psychiatric disorders. [45] Because of the lack of clarity regarding the definition and construct of hopelessness in the nonclinical general population, it has been suggested that there may be a difference in the factor structure of the BHS between patients and the general population. [48] The factor structure of the BHS may be less complicated in the nonclinical population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%