1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63375-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The York Mason Approach to Repair of Iatrogenic Rectourinary Fistulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operative management of rectourethral fistula remains controversial, with no single technique providing results that are successful enough to consider it the standard of care. 4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Because of the rarity of the condition, series describing the success of various repairs are limited by the small number of patients. Despite the choice of technique, there is a high rate of recurrent fistulas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operative management of rectourethral fistula remains controversial, with no single technique providing results that are successful enough to consider it the standard of care. 4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Because of the rarity of the condition, series describing the success of various repairs are limited by the small number of patients. Despite the choice of technique, there is a high rate of recurrent fistulas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The York Mason posterior, transanal, transrectal repair is a feasible and effective surgical approach. It allows excellent exposure of the fistulous tract and scarless dissection, making this one of the most widely used techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19]. The York Mason technique allows meticulous separation of the fecal and urinary systems and the possibility of avoiding fecal diversion [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, primary treatment of large fistulas or fistulas that occur in the setting of heavily irradiated tissue using local techniques are probably doomed to failure. 7 In some situations, techniques that allow interposition of viable tissue between the rectal and urethral openings can be useful; 9-11 however, dissection of the plane between the rectum and the urethra is challenging and can be hazardous in patients with previous radical prostatectomy or surgery for distal rectal cancer. Four to 25 percent 17 of patients presenting with complex rectourinary fistula require permanent fecal diversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%