2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12987-019-0124-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The year in review: progress in brain barriers and brain fluid research in 2018

Abstract: This editorial focuses on the progress made in brain barrier and brain fluid research in 2018. It highlights some recent advances in knowledge and techniques, as well as prevalent themes and controversies. Areas covered include: modeling, the brain endothelium, the neurovascular unit, the blood–CSF barrier and CSF, drug delivery, fluid movement within the brain, the impact of disease states, and heterogeneity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing data suggest that CSF circulation serves critical roles in brain maintenance ( Louveau et al, 2015 ; Da Mesquita et al, 2018a ; Mestre et al, 2020 ). Yet, specific mechanisms and pathways involved in CSF passage within intracranial cavities remain incompletely explained ( Keep et al, 2019 ; Rustenhoven et al, 2021 ). Historical literature asserts that AG protrude through dura, permitting CSF drainage into dural venous spaces (DVS, i.e., dural venous sinuses, dural veins, and lacunae; Kida et al, 1988 ; Kida et al, 1993 ; Welch and Pollay, 1961 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing data suggest that CSF circulation serves critical roles in brain maintenance ( Louveau et al, 2015 ; Da Mesquita et al, 2018a ; Mestre et al, 2020 ). Yet, specific mechanisms and pathways involved in CSF passage within intracranial cavities remain incompletely explained ( Keep et al, 2019 ; Rustenhoven et al, 2021 ). Historical literature asserts that AG protrude through dura, permitting CSF drainage into dural venous spaces (DVS, i.e., dural venous sinuses, dural veins, and lacunae; Kida et al, 1988 ; Kida et al, 1993 ; Welch and Pollay, 1961 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A ). These cells have been reported to meet the need for a reliable and reproducible in vitro model of the human BBB that can be used to screen drugs and understand mechanisms of neurological diseases ( 25 , 26 ). This benchmark protocol relies on performing a sequence of defined steps starting with the differentiation of PSCs into both neural and endothelial lineages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, a limitation of the current study and many other in vitro models of NDs, such as 2D single-cell type cultures or brain organoidbased models, is the absence of a functional in vitro BBB. Although significant progress in modeling the neuro-vascular unit has been made and a number of in vitro models of the BBB have been devel-oped on the basis of iPSCs, cell lines, or human umbilical vein endothelial sources (54,68,69), in vivo-like function of the barrier is notoriously difficult to achieve. This stems from the fact that (i) the BBB is not composed of one single cell type but rather requires the interplay of a number of cells with varying ratios to achieve in vivo functionality, (ii) they are not static in their physiological behavior but highly dynamic in terms of permeability as well as the receptors and transporters they express as a response to changes in environment, and (iii) vascular barriers are not the same throughout the human body but rather specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%