The blood-brain barrier (BBB) plays a vital role in regulating the trafficking of fluid, solutes and cells at the blood-brain interface and maintaining the homeostatic microenvironment of the CNS. Under pathological conditions, such as ischemic stroke, the BBB can be disrupted, followed by the extravasation of blood components into the brain and compromise of normal neuronal function. This article reviews recent advances in our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying BBB dysfunction and recovery after ischemic stroke. CNS cells in the neurovascular unit, as well as blood-borne peripheral cells constantly modulate the BBB and influence its breakdown and repair after ischemic stroke. The involvement of stroke risk factors and comorbid conditions further complicate the pathogenesis of neurovascular injury by predisposing the BBB to anatomical and functional changes that can exacerbate BBB dysfunction. Emphasis is also given to the process of long-term structural and functional restoration of the BBB after ischemic injury. With the development of novel research tools, future research on the BBB is likely to reveal promising potential therapeutic targets for protecting the BBB and improving patient outcome after ischemic stroke.
Hemoglobin causes brain edema, at least in part, through its degradation products. Limiting hemoglobin degradation coupled with the use of iron chelators may be a novel therapeutic approach to limit brain edema after ICH.
These results demonstrate that RBCs play a potentially important role in delayed edema development after ICH and that RBC lysis and hemoglobin toxicity may be useful targets for therapeutic intervention.
The mechanism by which intracerebral hemorrhage leads to the formation of brain edema is unknown. This study assesses the components of blood to determine if any are toxic to surrounding brain. Various solutions were infused stereotactically into the right basal ganglia of rats. The animals were sacrificed 24 hours later; brain edema and ion contents were measured. Whole blood caused an increase in brain water content and ion changes consistent with brain edema. Concentrated blood cells, serum from clotted blood, and plasma from unclotted blood all failed to provoke edema formation when infused directly into the brain. On the other hand, activation of the coagulation cascade by adding prothrombinase to plasma did produce brain edema. The edema response to whole blood could be prevented by adding a specific thrombin inhibitor, hirudin, to the injected blood. This study indicates that thrombin plays an important role in edema formation from an intracerebral blood clot.
Background and Purpose-Blood "toxicity" is hypothesized to induce edema and brain tissue injury following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Lobar ICH in pigs produces rapidly developing, marked perihematomal edema (Ͼ10% increase in water content) associated with clot-derived plasma protein accumulation. Coagulation cascade activation and, specifically, thrombin itself contribute to edema development during the first 24 hours after gray matter ICH in rats. In the present study, we sought to determine whether blood clot formation is necessary for edema development by comparing intracerebral infusions of heparinized and unheparinized blood in pig (white matter) and in rat (gray matter). We also examined heparin's effect on thrombin-induced gray matter edema. Methods-In pigs, we infused autologous blood (with or without heparin) into the cerebral white matter to produce lobar hematomas and froze the brains in situ at 1, 4, or 24 hours after ICH. We determined hematomal and perihematomal edema volumes on coronal sections by computer-assisted morphometry. In rats, we infused either blood or thrombin (with or without heparin) into the basal ganglia and measured water, sodium, and potassium contents at 24 hours after ICH. Results-In pigs, unheparinized blood induced rapid (at 1 hour) and prolonged (24 hours) perihematomal edema (average volume, 1.29Ϯ0.20 mL; nϭ6). No perihematomal edema was present following heparinized blood infusions (nϭ6). In rats, unheparinized blood produced significantly greater edema than heparinized blood infusions. As with whole blood, thrombin-induced gray matter edema at 24 hours was significantly reduced by coinjection of heparin. Conclusions-After ICH, blood clot formation is required for rapid and prolonged edema development in perihematomal white and gray matter. Thrombin also contributes to prolonged edema in gray matter. (Stroke. 1998;29:2580-2586.)
Background and Purpose-Edema formation after intracerebral hemorrhage has been linked to thrombin toxicity induced by the clot. However, thrombin at low concentrations actually protects neurons and astrocytes in culture from hypoglycemic and ischemic cell death. It is also known that a brief episode of brain ischemia increases neuronal tolerance to a subsequent severe ischemic episode. The objective of this study was to investigate whether pretreatment of the brain with low-dose thrombin induces tolerance to a subsequent large dose of thrombin injected into brain parenchyma. Methods-The rat brain was preconditioned with 1 U thrombin by direct infusion into the right caudate nucleus. After thrombin pretreatment, the effects of a large dose (5 U) of thrombin on brain edema formation were studied at different intervals. We examined whether heat-shock protein (HSP) 27, HSP32, and HSP70 were induced by Western blot analysis, immunocytochemistry, and immunofluorescent double staining. Results-Thrombin pretreatment significantly attenuated the brain edema that normally follows the infusion of a large dose of thrombin (79.2Ϯ0.4 versus 84.0Ϯ0.3; PϽ0.01). This effect was abolished by the thrombin inhibitor hirudin. Time course studies showed that the maximal effect of thrombin preconditioning (TPC) on brain edema formation was 7 days after pretreatment. This time course corresponded to marked upregulation of HSP27 in the ipsilateral brain. TPC also induced HSP32, but this effect occurred earlier than the effect on edema formation. TPC had no effect on HSP70.Immunocytochemistry and immunofluorescent double labeling showed that HSP27 and HSP32 were expressed in astrocytes after TPC. Conclusions-The phenomenon of thrombin-induced tolerance of the brain to edema formation may be related to HSP27 induction. (Stroke. 1999;30:1247-1255.)
Although recent studies have suggested that CC chemokine CCL2 may directly affect the angiogenesis, the signaling events involved in such regulation remain to be determined. This study investigated a potential signal mechanism involved in CCL2-induced angiogenesis. Our in vitro and in vivo (hemangioma model of angiogenesis) experiments confirmed earlier findings that CCL2 can induce angiogenesis directly. Using a gene array analysis, CCL2 was found to induce expression of several angiogenic factors in brain endothelial cells. Among the most prominent was an up-regulation in Ets-1 transcription factor. CCL2 induced a significant increase in Ets-1 mRNA and protein expression as well as Ets-1 DNA-binding activity. Importantly, Ets-1 antisense oligonucleotide markedly abrogated in vitro CCL2-induced angiogenesis, suggesting that Ets-1 is critically involved in this process. Activation of Ets-1 by CCL2 further regulated some of Ets-1 target molecules including β3 integrins. CCL2 induced significant up-regulation of β3 mRNA and protein expression, and this effect of CCL2 was prevented by the Ets-1 antisense oligonucleotide. The functional regulation of Ets-1 activity by CCL2 was dependent on ERK-1/2 cascade. Inhibition of ERK1/2 activity by PD98509 prevented CCL2-induced increases in Ets-1 DNA-binding activity and Ets-1 mRNA expression. Based on these findings, we suggest that Ets-1 transcription factor plays a critical role in CCL2 actions on brain endothelial cells and CCL2-induced angiogenesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.