2004
DOI: 10.3368/lj.23.2.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Yamuna Riverfront, India: A Comparative Study of Islamic And Hindu Traditions In Cultural Landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have studied water-lifting structures, distribution systems, and irrigation requirements (Wescoat, 2000a). Sinha and Ruggles (2004) have contrasted those elevated Mughal riverfront gardens with the immersive ghats at Mathura upstream, which relied on gravity flow of the Yamuna River. In a study approaching the topic considered here, Irfan Habib (1996, p. 133) analyzed Mughal data on the hundreds of animals, gardeners, and equipment employed in four of the major gardens of Agra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have studied water-lifting structures, distribution systems, and irrigation requirements (Wescoat, 2000a). Sinha and Ruggles (2004) have contrasted those elevated Mughal riverfront gardens with the immersive ghats at Mathura upstream, which relied on gravity flow of the Yamuna River. In a study approaching the topic considered here, Irfan Habib (1996, p. 133) analyzed Mughal data on the hundreds of animals, gardeners, and equipment employed in four of the major gardens of Agra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%