This study aimed to explain the mechanism of experience, representation, and verbal reasoning on people with visual impairment. The methods used in this study were focused group discussion (FGD), interview, and think-aloud. The result of this study showed that participants often used concrete versus abstract comparison to explain their difficulties in understanding and verbal reasoning; however, the term concrete often refers to something they could immediately experience, while abstract means something that requires visual information. Some concepts may be abstract, but it can be understood if it is related to their personal experience. Concrete and abstract therefore, is a way to describe the limitation of the participant's mental representation of object. It is also suggested that early experience on childhood is the primary foundation for the future object representation that determines one's ability in abstract concept formation.