2003
DOI: 10.1177/026461960302100304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The world of touch: an international survey of tactile maps. Part 2: design

Abstract: This paper reports the findings of an international survey that collected data on production methods, techniques, outputs and design preferences among tactile map producers, designers and researchers worldwide. A number of consistencies and inconsistencies are identified and we speculate on the extent to which the current state of tactile map production is likely to meet the needs of the client population. In this second part of the report we focus on issues of map design, such as the choice of map size and fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, increasing the automation and reducing the time spent on map design would be greatly helpful. When transcribers and mobility instructors are interviewed, spacing is clearly ranked as one of the main variables for tactile map design [10], which also pleads for using more automated cartography. With interactive interfaces widering multi-modal interfaces [11], automated processing will be mandatory, such as multi-scale web mapping is accelerating the need for automated topographic cartography.…”
Section: Related Work 21 On Demand Mapping For Visually Impaired Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, increasing the automation and reducing the time spent on map design would be greatly helpful. When transcribers and mobility instructors are interviewed, spacing is clearly ranked as one of the main variables for tactile map design [10], which also pleads for using more automated cartography. With interactive interfaces widering multi-modal interfaces [11], automated processing will be mandatory, such as multi-scale web mapping is accelerating the need for automated topographic cartography.…”
Section: Related Work 21 On Demand Mapping For Visually Impaired Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we found no evidence on the optimum size of a tactile map. However, the visually impaired participants of a survey on where the map should be used (at home, in situ...) commented that due to their weight, tactile maps should not be portable [10]. So the fact that the map is portable or not should not be a factor for determining the best size for a tactile map.…”
Section: Guidelines For Understandable Tactile Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidelines should take into account the differences in age, vision and other abilities of the potential users. The design should take into account and include the map size and format, the choice of symbols and the scale [11]. The current article tackles these questions based on a questionnaire on existing public tactile maps in Finland and their usability and use within O&M instruction procedure.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Readability Of Tactile Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these issues relate to the map authoring and production process or to limitations of the tangible output. Traditional tactile maps consist of raised elements conveying spatial properties (points, lines, and regions), surface attributes conveying symbolic properties and feature characteristics (dots/dashes, texture variation, and line-height/thickness), and braille labels to convey feature names or semantic information (for reviews, see Edman, 1992;Rowell and Ungar, 2003b). The authoring process for effectively converting visual maps into tactile analogs or developing these materials from scratch involves specialized human expertise, which is expensive in terms of both time and labor costs.…”
Section: Background Traditional Tactile Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%