2009
DOI: 10.1108/02640470911004093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The WIPO development agenda and the contribution of the international library community

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the international strengthening of copyright law in developing countries and the active involvement of the international library community in the movement against it.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes the overprotection of intellectual property rights through international and bilateral treaties, the reaction against such through the proposal of a WIPO development agenda, and the contribution of the international library organizations to the debates an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with the evolution of society's views regarding copyright laws and other laws governing intellectual property, the open access movement (e.g. Suber, 2003; McCulloch, 2006; Fernández‐Molina and Guimarães, 2009) seems to provide possible solutions to fulfill students' needs. Although the copyright laws or the open access progress themselves are not the focus of this study, students' (mis)conceptions of digital resource‐related copyright laws, as the results presented in this study, lead us to critically rethink and reflect on these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the evolution of society's views regarding copyright laws and other laws governing intellectual property, the open access movement (e.g. Suber, 2003; McCulloch, 2006; Fernández‐Molina and Guimarães, 2009) seems to provide possible solutions to fulfill students' needs. Although the copyright laws or the open access progress themselves are not the focus of this study, students' (mis)conceptions of digital resource‐related copyright laws, as the results presented in this study, lead us to critically rethink and reflect on these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intellectual property rights -including copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights, trade secrets-are knowledge asset generators but represent only a portion of the overall intellectual capital of a modern library. Moreover, exceptions and harmonization of intellectual property rights legislation is discussed for libraries and archives in a globalized manner (Fernandez-Molina & Guimaraes, 2009). At the same time, the digitization of out of copyright material is gradually undertaken by public libraries so as to preserve old, brittle and crumbling documents for their communities.…”
Section: Intellectual Capital Versus Intellectual Capital Access Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steadfast intervention of library associations in this process seems to have been effective: the final list of 45 recommendations included their most noteworthy proposals, referring to the public domain, to participation in the activities of establishing norms, and the need to take into account the different levels of development. What is more, these points were also among the 19 that were considered essential and therefore designated for immediate implementation (Fernández-Molina and Guimarães, 2009).…”
Section: The Wipo Development Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%