College students' misunderstandings about copyright laws for digital library resources

Abstract

PurposeThis paper has two primary purposes: to explore common copyright‐related problems that arise when librarians promote the use of digital library resources; and to investigate college students' misconceptions of copyright laws that arise when the students use these resources.Design/methodology/approachFour librarians in charge of the management of digital library resources were interviewed regarding student‐users' problematic copyright‐infringement behaviors that these librarians often encountered when they promoted the use of digital library resources. Also, a semi‐structured questionnaire with nine questions about copyright‐related behaviors was developed and distributed to college students. Students needed not only to identify whether the behavior was acceptable, but also to explain the reasons for their identification. A total of 109 valid sets of data were collected from 18 universities or colleges, the sets comprising responses from 48 undergraduate, 56 postgraduate, and five doctoral students.FindingsThe librarian‐interview results indicate that students' problematic behaviors included systematic downloading, distribution to unauthorized users, and going beyond the purpose and character of academic use. The student‐survey results indicate that students had four major areas of misunderstanding about copyright laws when using digital library resources: the digital resources should be shared; the downloaded digital resources are all legitimately authorized and permitted; all educational use is fair use; and any downloading is permitted as long as students are paying tuition.Originality/valueThis paper explores students' understanding and misunderstandings that arose when students used the school digital library resources and discusses implications of these results for librarians and libraries with regard to the design of related instruction. The paper also presents interpretations of students' thoughts and conduct, as well as some future possible research topics.

Why do they become potential cyber-plagiarizers? Exploring the alternative thinking of copy-and-paste youth in Taiwan

“…With the convenience of digital copy-and-paste techniques, student cheating with an emphasis on plagiarism has changed and expanded. Baruchson-Arbib and Yaari (2004) investigated the differences between acts of plagiarism from the print era and those from the Internet era, and found that, according to many student respondents, "Information on the Internet belongs to the public domain" (p. 5) (see also Wu, Chou, Ke, & Wang, 2010).…”

Creation and Use of Intellectual Works in the Academic Environment: Students' Knowledge About Copyright and Copyleft

“…Fewer efforts are dedicated to determining the levels of knowledge and depths of misunderstanding that students have today. Two research studies carried out in Taiwan (Chou, Chan, & Wu, 2007;Wu, Chou, Ke, & Wang, 2010) underline the confusion and erroneous interpretations, e.g., that all contents available on the Internet are free to use, at no cost; that all educational uses constitute fair use; and that any downloading is permitted for students paying tuition. Also deserving mention here is the study by the Joint Information Systems Committee (2012) focusing specifically on doctorate students, again reflecting the generalized absence of clarity when it comes to copyright related with the publication and diffusion of one's PhD research.…”

The Importance of Identifying and Accommodating E-Resource Usage Data for the Presence of Outliers. The Negative Impacts of Inaccurate E-Journal Usage Data.

“…14 Misunderstanding and misinterpretation of copyright laws in addition to THE IMPORTANCE OF IDENTIFYING AND ACCOMMODATING E-RESOURCES USAGE DATA FOR THE PRESENCE OF OUTLIERS | LAMOTHE 33 unfamiliarity with and general apathy toward these same copyright laws further contribute to unlawful downloading of protected material. 15 Many students are unaware that the transmission of downloaded articles violates copyright laws and license agreements and often misunderstand the fair use aspect of copyright as meaning that the acquisition and distribution of licensed content for the purpose of education is allowed. 16 In the minds of these students, distribution is permitted provided it is not for profit.…”

“…18 Aggravating the situation are students who firmly believe that by paying tuition they have permission to do whatever they wish with their institutions' e-resources. 19 Some of these same students even use web robots to download as much as possible thereby saving them time and energy. 20 They consider the downloaded item as their personal property.…”