2021
DOI: 10.33012/2021.18006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Whole Works: A GNSS/IMU Tight Coupled Filter for Android Raw GNSS Measurements with Local Ground Augmentation Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other group of studies is focused on practical applications, taking into account many differing positioning approaches, including single point positioning (SPP) [ 11 , 12 ], precise point positioning (PPP) [ 13 , 14 ], differential GNSS (DGNSS) [ 15 , 16 ], real-time kinematics (RTK) [ 17 , 18 ], post-processed kinematics (PPK) [ 19 ] and static (carrier-phase based) positioning [ 20 ]. To supplement the low-quality GNSS data from smartphones, authors have recently focused on combinations with other sensors usable for positioning, e.g., inertial measurement units (IMU) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Other approaches include, e.g., the aid of 3D maps [ 24 ] and collaborative smartphone positioning [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other group of studies is focused on practical applications, taking into account many differing positioning approaches, including single point positioning (SPP) [ 11 , 12 ], precise point positioning (PPP) [ 13 , 14 ], differential GNSS (DGNSS) [ 15 , 16 ], real-time kinematics (RTK) [ 17 , 18 ], post-processed kinematics (PPK) [ 19 ] and static (carrier-phase based) positioning [ 20 ]. To supplement the low-quality GNSS data from smartphones, authors have recently focused on combinations with other sensors usable for positioning, e.g., inertial measurement units (IMU) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Other approaches include, e.g., the aid of 3D maps [ 24 ] and collaborative smartphone positioning [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2021 GSDC, the 1st-place winner used factor graph optimization, coupled with Takasu’s version of the RTKLIB, to obtain a score of 1.62 m [ 11 ]. Other teams used Google’s baseline Android navigation engine [ 16 ] or their own proprietary navigation engines [ 17 ]. In the Results section of the paper, the performance of the updated RTKLIB against other navigation engines will be provided using the official Kaggle scoring system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%