2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The wettability of polytetrafluoroethylene and polymethylmethacrylate by aqueous solutions of Triton X-100 and propanol mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(126 reference statements)
1
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the difference between the adhesion and the cohesion work is equal to the coefficient of spreading of a liquid or solution over the solid surface, knowledge of not only the changes of the water surface tension under the influence of surfactant but also of its work of adhesion to solid surface is very important for determining the wettability criterion of a given solid [1,3]. It appeared that the work of adhesion of aqueous solutions of different kinds of surface-active agents and their mixtures to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) surfaces does not practically depend on the composition and concentration of solution and is two times higher than the critical surface tension of its wetting [2][3][4][5], which in turn is higher than the surface tension of PTFE determined from contact angles for n-alkanes [4,[6][7][8]. In contrast to PTFE it appeared that the adhesion work of such kind of solution to the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) surface depends on the concentration, composition, and the kind of the surface-active agent, and that the critical surface tension of PMMA wetting is considerably lower than its surface tension and even the Lifshitz-van der Waals component of this tension [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the difference between the adhesion and the cohesion work is equal to the coefficient of spreading of a liquid or solution over the solid surface, knowledge of not only the changes of the water surface tension under the influence of surfactant but also of its work of adhesion to solid surface is very important for determining the wettability criterion of a given solid [1,3]. It appeared that the work of adhesion of aqueous solutions of different kinds of surface-active agents and their mixtures to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) surfaces does not practically depend on the composition and concentration of solution and is two times higher than the critical surface tension of its wetting [2][3][4][5], which in turn is higher than the surface tension of PTFE determined from contact angles for n-alkanes [4,[6][7][8]. In contrast to PTFE it appeared that the adhesion work of such kind of solution to the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) surface depends on the concentration, composition, and the kind of the surface-active agent, and that the critical surface tension of PMMA wetting is considerably lower than its surface tension and even the Lifshitz-van der Waals component of this tension [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the slopes of conventional surfactants such as nonionic surfactant TX-100, [ 21 ] anionic surfactant SDDS, [ 23 ] and cationic surfactants CTAB, [ 34 ] CPyB, [ 34 ] C 12 (EDMAB) [ 19 ], and BDDAB 19 are all negative, demonstrating that they absorb at the PMMA-water interface via hydrophobic interactions. Meanwhile, the conventional surfactants exhibit slopes of about −0.3, which indicates that they are likely to tile at the PMMA–liquid interface with about 1/3 of the adsorption amounts at the air–liquid interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the surfactants’ concentration continues to increase, the contact angle and interfacial tension change little. Zdziennicka et al investigated the wettability of cationic surfactants (CTAB, CPyB), [ 20 ] nonionic surfactants (TX-100, TX-114) [ 21 , 22 ] and anionic surfactants (SDDS, SHS) [ 23 ] on the PMMA surface. It is found that the contact angles and the interfacial free energy of PMMA–liquid ( γ SL ) of these conventional surfactants gradually decreased with the increase in surfactant concentration, which indicates that the surfactants will adsorb on PMMA surface by hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PTFE is a hydrophobic material described by low surface energy and high contact angle (>110 degrees) to water-based compounds. 17 The water contact angle further increases due to the porosity of extended PTFE and can reach up to 160 degrees. 18 Several strategies have been employed aiming at improving the wetting capacity of hydrophobic materials and thereby protein adsorption (e.g., bombardment with ions, irradiation with ultraviolet light, and plasma discharge).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%