2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10986-010-9069-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The weak asymptotic equivalence and the generalized inverse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanks to the connection between the γ index, the upper Matuszewska index and the almost monotonicity properties, it is possible to ensure that (9) and (10) are valid under some standard assumptions.…”
Section: Proof the Largest Convex Minorant Of H Can Be Represented Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the connection between the γ index, the upper Matuszewska index and the almost monotonicity properties, it is possible to ensure that (9) and (10) are valid under some standard assumptions.…”
Section: Proof the Largest Convex Minorant Of H Can Be Represented Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its generalized inverse (see [1,15]) (x [t] ) ← , t x 1 , belongs to the class ORV f (see [11]). But, since (x [t] ) ← is strongly asymptotically equivalent to δ x (t) for t → ∞ [12], one has δ x ∈ ORV f .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, according to [16] δ x is strongly asymptotically equivalent to (x [t] ) ← (for t → ∞), so that (x [t] ) ← ∈ ORV f . By a result from [11], x [t] belongs to the class PI * f . Therefore, x ∈ PI * s .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations