The “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain–behavioral relationships in experimental pain

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to create a temporary “virtual lesion” (VL) of a target cortical area, disrupting its function and associated behavior. Transcranial magnetic stimulation can therefore test the functional role of specific brain areas. This scoping review aims at investigating the current literature of the “online” TMS-evoked VL approach to studying brain–behavioral relationships during experimental pain in healthy subjects. Ovid-Medline, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched. Included studies tested different TMS-based VLs of various pain brain areas during continuous experimental pain or when time-locked to a noxious stimulus. Outcome measures assessed different pain measurements. Initial screening resulted in a total of 403 studies, of which 17 studies were included in the review. The VLs were directed to the prefrontal, primary and secondary somatosensory, primary motor, and parietal cortices through single/double/triple/sequence of five-TMS pulses or through repeated TMS during mechanical, electrical contact, radiant heat, or capsaicin-evoked noxious stimulation. Despite a wide variability among the VL protocols, outcome measures, and study designs, a behavioral VL effect (decrease or increase in pain responses) was achieved in the majority of the studies. However, such findings on the relationships between the modified brain activity and the manifested pain characteristics were often mixed. To conclude, TMS–elicited VLs during experimental pain empower our understanding of brain–behavior relationships at specific time points during pain processing. The mixed findings of these relationships call for an obligatory standard of all pain-related TMS protocols for clearly determining the magnitude and direction of TMS-induced behavioral effects.

Are We Right about the Right TPJ? A Review of Brain Stimulation and Social Cognition in the Right Temporal Parietal Junction

“…Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and tDCS are scalp-based techniques. This allows for ease of use from determining timings to having few limitations in terms of the physical restraints found in MRI/fMRI [9,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Further, logic dictates that if Area X is removed and the behavior under investigation changes, Area X may play a role in that behavior.…”

The Neurological Asymmetry of Self-Face Recognition

“…That is, by disrupting regions of the RH using noninvasive techniques, researchers were discovering that SFR was not just correlated with the RH but was actually involved in a causal relationship. The main methods employed thus far involve a version of a 'virtual lesion' in which a brain area is either temporarily taken offline or temporarily severely inhibited [99,100]. Basically, different regions of the brain were disrupted, and the subsequent changes in self-face recognition were measured, which established causality.…”

Whole-Language and Item-Specific Inhibition in Bilingual Language Switching: The Role of Domain–General Inhibitory Control

“…Furthermore, functional neuroimaging is unable to discern whether the pre-SMA plays a causal role in language switching or simply co-activates with the language control network. In the present study, we take the approach of creating a "virtual lesion", by disrupting local brain activity in this region using non-invasive brain stimulation [43]. If this has an impact on language switching performance, then a causal relationship can be established between pre-SMA activity and language control.…”