The viewer doesn't always seem to care—response to fake animal rescues on YouTube and implications for social media self‐policing policies

Abstract

Animal‐related content on social media is hugely popular but is not always appropriate in terms of how animals are portrayed or how they are treated. This has potential implications beyond the individual animals involved, for viewers, for wild animal populations, and for societies and their interactions with animals. Whilst social media platforms usually publish guidelines for permitted content, enforcement relies at least in part on viewers reporting inappropriate posts. Currently, there is no external regulation of social media platforms. Based on a set of 241 ‘fake animal rescue’ videos that exhibited clear signs of animal cruelty and strong evidence of being deliberately staged (i.e. fake), we found little evidence that viewers disliked the videos and an overall mixed response in terms of awareness of the fake nature of the videos, and their attitudes towards the welfare of the animals involved. Our findings suggest, firstly, that, despite the narrowly defined nature of the videos used in this case study, exposure rates can be extremely high (one of the videos had been viewed over 100 million times), and, secondly, that many YouTube viewers cannot identify (or are not concerned by) animal welfare or conservation issues within a social media context. In terms of the current policy approach of social media platforms, our findings raise questions regarding the value of their current reliance on consumers as watch dogs. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Elephant ‘selfies’: Evaluating the effectiveness of Instagram’s warning of the potential negative impacts of photo opportunities with wild animals

“…Compliance, or indeed detection of non-compliance, is, in most cases, at least partly dependent on viewers identifying and flagging inappropriate content (e.g. [ 57 ]). In the case of wildlife selfies this is difficult because there is nothing in the image itself to suggest cruelty to nonhuman animals or negative conservation impacts on threatened species; neither is it the case that every image of a smiling human depicted alongside a wild animal is associated with detrimental impacts on animals at either an individual, population, or species level.…”

Insights on the distribution, catch and release and public sentiment towards recreational angling of mahseers—A study of YouTube videos from India

“…To categorize the videos based on the species of mahseer caught for further analysis, multiple screenshots of each catch were captured. These photographs were then zoomed to know the species‐specific morphological characteristics (Harrington et al, 2019, 2023) utilized by the taxonomists for identification, that is, mouth position, body and fin colouration and lateral line scale count (Dasgupta, 1989; Hamilton, 1822; Jaafar et al, 2021; Laskar et al, 2013; Menon, 1992; Pinder et al, 2019). We were able to extract the count of fin rays, another important taxonomic feature, for many individuals from the angling videos.…”

Private and civic actions as distinct types of individual engagement for transforming the exotic pet trade

“…The survey instrument contained some ambiguity and conflation, making it difficult to distinguish between reasons in some of the re- welfare issues and distinguish between different objectives of business operations only by looking at photos of people interacting with exotic pets (Harrington et al, 2023). We presented pictures exemplifying common practices associated with the exotic pet trade in a way that they are typically shared on social media (e.g.…”

“…However, because our measures of attitudes and behavioural intentions were not based on different types of venues, and because our sample size was sufficiently large, such ambiguity should have only added noise to our results rather than changing their direction. It is indeed difficult to identify animal welfare issues and distinguish between different objectives of business operations only by looking at photos of people interacting with exotic pets (Harrington et al, 2023). We presented pictures exemplifying common practices associated with the exotic pet trade in a way that they are typically shared on social media (e.g.…”