2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01528.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vibratory characteristics of obturators with different bulb height and form designs

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the vibratory characteristics of obturator prostheses are affected by bulb design, i.e.: the hollow or buccal flange type, and different lateral and medial bulb heights. Buccal flange and hollow bulb obturator prostheses were fabricated with two different lateral bulb wall heights and two different medial bulb wall heights. Ultimately, eight obturator prostheses were prepared for evaluation of their vibratory characteristics. The frequency-response functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the most frequent maxillary defect is Aramany class 1, as in the present case. In these cases, a large unilateral maxillary defect involving removal of the teeth on one side of the arch subjects the abutment teeth on the opposite side to rotational and dislodging forces exerted by the obturator . Therefore, in addition to drooping of the flap, it is considered that this mechanism leads to clasp fracture and nasal regurgitation with conventional obturator prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the most frequent maxillary defect is Aramany class 1, as in the present case. In these cases, a large unilateral maxillary defect involving removal of the teeth on one side of the arch subjects the abutment teeth on the opposite side to rotational and dislodging forces exerted by the obturator . Therefore, in addition to drooping of the flap, it is considered that this mechanism leads to clasp fracture and nasal regurgitation with conventional obturator prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The denture component of the obturator allows mastication of soft foods initially and harder foods several days later [3]. Speech is minimally altered and in many instances remains nearly unchanged [7,8]. Exploration of the defect by the tongue is prevented, and the patient remains unaware of the dimensions of the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O desenvolvimento de forças de alavanca e linhas de fulcro aumenta drasticamente as forças sobre os tecidos de suporte durante a mastigação 16,23 . O efeito do peso intrínseco da prótese obturadora maxilar sobre os tecidos de suporte representa um fator agravante 25 , o que torna fundamental a adequada avaliação dos tecidos remanescentes para o bom desempenho da prótese e preservação das estruturas anatômicas de retenção e suporte 26 .…”
Section: Figura 3 Comparação Entre Os Grupos Experimentais Ao Longo unclassified