1996
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.1996.0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vibrational response of single-chambered fish swimbladders to low-frequency sound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fish hearing these cries can localize their source (Fay and Edds-Walton 2000) and may acquire information about predator identity. Moreover, the swimbladders of large predators scatter ambient noise (wave action for example) potentially allowing nearby otophysan prey to detect and identify nearby predators (Rogers 1986;Lewis and Rogers 1996). Clearly, more information is needed on the types of sound stimuli generated by predators or startled prey to more fully explore the role of audition in mediating predator-prey interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fish hearing these cries can localize their source (Fay and Edds-Walton 2000) and may acquire information about predator identity. Moreover, the swimbladders of large predators scatter ambient noise (wave action for example) potentially allowing nearby otophysan prey to detect and identify nearby predators (Rogers 1986;Lewis and Rogers 1996). Clearly, more information is needed on the types of sound stimuli generated by predators or startled prey to more fully explore the role of audition in mediating predator-prey interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Echo amplitudes can then be estimated throughout the Rayleigh and geometric scattering regions. Verifying model predictions under controlled conditions is possible for resonance (Cox and Rogers, 1987; Lewis and Rogers, 1996) and geometric (Nakken and Olsen, 1977; Rose and Porter, 1996) scattering frequencies. Models used to estimate echo amplitudes are continuously evolving (see table 1 in Horne and Clay, 1998), but can generally be grouped into geometric and empirical categories.…”
Section: Modelling Acoustic Backscattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LC is proposed to translate sound pressure fluctuations from the swim bladder horns to fluid motion in the lateral line canal and also secondary particle motions to the ear (Webb, 1998) that potentially enhance the perception of the acoustic field during social interactions (Tricas et al, 2006). The gas-filled swim bladder and swim bladder horns are thought to be relatively insensitive to infrasonic sound pressure and have complex resonant properties at higher frequencies between 100-2000 Hz that can vary considerably among species and with depth (Fine et al, 2009;Lewis and Rogers, 1996;Sand and Hawkins, 1973). Below, we discuss the detection of acoustic fields by the ear and lateral line in the context of butterflyfish social interactions, and the potential contributions to each by the LC.…”
Section: The Perception Of Butterflyfish Soundsmentioning
confidence: 99%