The viable system model’s support to social responsibility

Abstract

Purpose The consequences of human social irresponsibility urge socially responsible reactions. The authors expose the consequences of socially irresponsible behaviour and state possible requisitely holistic tools to eliminate organisations’ dangerous and socially irresponsible behaviour. This paper aims to examine how the viable system model (the VSM) used as a diagnostic tool can help organisations support socially responsible behaviour. Design/methodology/approach Given the variety of systems methodologies, the authors selected the VSM as a key methodological tool of Organizational Cybernetics. A case-study approach is used to demonstrate the power of the VSM as a diagnostic tool. Findings Humans need to replace recklessness and selfishness by faster re-orientation towards a socially responsible society. By following the cybernetic circle of the preparation and implementation of the management process and practising social responsibility via the VSM, organisations can conduct socially responsible business operations for a socially responsible society. Respecting the pluralist nature of social responsibility and a limited framework of the VSM, the VSM analysis needs to be supported by interpretive systems approaches, such as Strategic Assumptions Surfacing and Testing (SAST). Research limitations/implications The presented study’s limitation is the case study of a selected organisation from Europe. The discussion could be relevant to each organisation, which is observed as a viable system. The insights gained with this case study can be broadened by empirical research involving diverse organisations from various countries. Practical implications Research results indicate socially irresponsible behaviours of the researched organisation and possible ways of overcoming them. The cybernetic circle of the preparation and implementation of socially responsible management processes through the VSM offers a possible path towards more social responsibility in organisations. Moreover, the VSM should be used in combination with interpretive systems approaches, such as SAST. Social implications The generality of the VSM indicates that decision-makers could use the VSM for diagnosing socially irresponsible behaviour in organisations and for redesigning organisations to help develop a more socially responsible society. Originality/value The paper contributes to a cybernetic framework and methodological support to social responsibility. This study could serve as an essential starting point for organisations wishing to take further steps towards social responsibility.

Corporate social responsibility and expected benefits in the financial sector: Empirical evidence from Serbia

“…Consequently, organizations gain certain benefits from socially responsible activities towards the local community in terms of achieving business success. In fact, an organization that is an active member of the community through the CSR, achieves positive results in terms of strengthening its reputation and image, and thus competitiveness (Štrukelj, 2021;Zlatanović, 2015).…”

“…As one of the most important element of external CSR is environmental protection, which includes activities related to: dedicated usage of energy and materials, reduction of environmental pollution, usage of safe technologies and biodegradable materials, development of recycling, reduction of energy costs, development of safe packaging (Stojanovic-Aleksić et al, 2016;Štrukelj et al, 2021). In fact, the environmental dimension of business is seen as one of the basic ones, and for decades, special attention has been put on environmental issues.…”

“…In general, two key dimensions of social responsibility can be distinguishedexternal and internal. The internal dimension of social responsibility includes care for the health of employees and safety at work, beyond the limits defined by law, respect for individual differences and problems faced by team members, mutual respect and understanding, promoting humanity and care for people, which is not limited only to working hours, but also include an attempt to achieve a balance between work, family and free time (Babić & Zlatanović, 2020;Štrukelj, Zlatanović, Nikolić, & Sternad-Zabukovšek, 2021). The external dimension of social responsibility refers to all external stakeholders, and it is reflected in the rational use of resources, reduction of emissions of harmful substances, recycling and similar.…”

Drivers of digital corporate social responsibility during unprecedented crises: an institutional perspective

“…As digital transformation has encompassed all aspects of society's life and activities, firms have also realized the importance of digital platforms in forming and implementing their CSR (Espejo and Lepskiy, 2020). Digital CSR can be identified as the communication threshold at which organizations launch and implement their CSR initiatives via online applications and social media platforms ( Strukelj et al, 2021). COVID-19 has increased people's engagement with social media platforms by 61% over usual usage rates, inspiring organizations to utilize these platforms to undertake and communicate their CSR agendas (Puriwat and Tripopsakul, 2021).…”

Use of cloud model to evaluate corporate social responsibility of pharmaceutical companies

“…As an important part of the global industrial and economic chain, China is no exception. Enterprises bring a series of negative externalities while pursuing economic profits, such as drug quality, production safety and environmental pollution (Min et al, 2017;Štrukelj et al, 2021). As the main supplier of pharmaceutical products, pharmaceutical enterprises play a vital role in the process of economic and social development and shoulder the mission of guaranteeing people's lives and safety (Zhao et al, 2012).…”