2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Varying Coherences of Implied Motion Modulates the Subjective Time Perception

Abstract: Previous research has demonstrated that duration of implied motion (IM) was dilated, whereas hMT+ activity related to perceptual processes on IM stimuli could be modulated by their motion coherence. Based on these findings, the present study aimed to examine whether subjective time perception of IM stimuli would be influenced by varying coherence levels. A temporal bisection task was used to measure the subjective experience of time, in which photographic stimuli showing a human moving in four directions (left… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, participants' RTs did increase with angular distance (see Supplemental Figures 5A and 5B), though such effects could instead reflect difficulty across trials (Pramod et al, 2022). It is also possible that our task induced some degree of implied motion (Kourtzi & Kanwisher, 2000;Li et al, 2021), which could account for the relation between RT and angular distance, rather than partial simulation per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand, participants' RTs did increase with angular distance (see Supplemental Figures 5A and 5B), though such effects could instead reflect difficulty across trials (Pramod et al, 2022). It is also possible that our task induced some degree of implied motion (Kourtzi & Kanwisher, 2000;Li et al, 2021), which could account for the relation between RT and angular distance, rather than partial simulation per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The other reason was that in the psychophysical experiment, we tried to measure the luminance contrast sensitivity using psychometric functions in order to obtain the magnitude of the luminance signal. Although a psychometric function can be obtained by a complex visual stimulus (Ueda et al, 2018;Li et al, 2021), in our case we were afraid we would not be able to obtain the magnitude of the luminance signal from the function. Therefore, we thought it would be better to make the visual stimulus simple because we did not have a specific model to estimate the magnitude of the luminance signal from the psychometric functions obtained from the visual stimulus with this ellipse background pattern.…”
Section: Differences Of Visual Stimuli Between the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Word distance between the two words were varied such that the two words were either close or distant, via manipulating semantic (Experiment 1) or phonological (Experiment 2) similarity ( Hillinger, 1980 ; Rouibah et al, 1999 ; Zhou and Marslen-Wilson, 2000 ). We used the classic temporal bisection task ( Penney et al, 2008 ; Matthews and Meck, 2016 ; Li et al, 2021 ) to examine the subjective temporal distance. In this task, participants are first presented with multiple “short” and “long” anchor time intervals, followed by a test phase in which they judge a set of intermediate intervals (aka, the probe intervals) as being closer to the “short” or “long” anchor intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%