2006
DOI: 10.2307/41166336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value Palette: A Tool for Full Spectrum Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Companies started publishing separate environmental reports in 1989 (Kolk 2004), and this trend intensified in the 1990's, particularly in Europe and North America (Mathews 1997;Wheeler and Elkington 2001). In 1993, about 70 companies published environmental reports (Elkington, Emerson and Beloe 2006) and by 1996 this number had jumped to 300-400 (Wheeler and Elkington 2001).…”
Section: Analogical Work In the Gri Sustainability Reporting Before Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companies started publishing separate environmental reports in 1989 (Kolk 2004), and this trend intensified in the 1990's, particularly in Europe and North America (Mathews 1997;Wheeler and Elkington 2001). In 1993, about 70 companies published environmental reports (Elkington, Emerson and Beloe 2006) and by 1996 this number had jumped to 300-400 (Wheeler and Elkington 2001).…”
Section: Analogical Work In the Gri Sustainability Reporting Before Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach maintains that value is indeed a central issue for business, but that it must be redefined so that it is based not solely on economic logic. The Triple Bottom Line and Blended Value concepts are two prominent examples, both of which define social value and environmental value, as well economic value (Elkington, et al, 2006). However, putting these new concepts into practice remains an elusive goal.…”
Section: Normative Vs Descriptive Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, many firms view the environment as a distinct functional domain, isolated from core business issues (Elkington, Emerson & Beloe, 2006;Hoffman & Ventresca, 1999;Walley & Whitehead, 1994). However, this approach is antithetical to creating a competitively advantageous environmental strategy since greater involvement of core functional units in environmental issues usually leads to improvements in both economic performance and environmental performance (Judge & Douglas, 1998;Wade-Benzoni, Hoffman, Thompson, Moore, Gillespie & Bazerman, 2002), albeit not always (Russo & Harrison, 2006).…”
Section: Strategic Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quest for a tripartite win for the economy, society, and for the environment led to the development of the triple bottom line (Elkington, Emerson & Beloe, 2006). The reason behind the triple bottom line paradigm is that a corporation's ultimate success should be measured not just by the traditional financial bottom line, but also by its social/ethical and environmental performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%