2007
DOI: 10.1177/0149206307302553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review

Abstract: The literature on organizations and the natural environment, published since 1992, is reviewed, with the purpose of assessing its contributions to strategy and organizational theory. I perform the review at three levels -firm, industry and organizational environment. Subsequently, I discuss empirical and conceptual constraints on the production of quality research, and highlight research that successfully overcomes these barriers. * Joan Enric Ricart greatly helped streamline the structure and clarify the expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
417
0
26

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 442 publications
(447 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
4
417
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…A company that is consistently socially, environmentally, and financially responsible should ultimately obtain tangible benefits from such responsibility in the form of: cost reductions through decreased regulatory or litigation risk and higher material and energy efficiency; more stable relations with the financial community and stakeholders; increased productivity through attracting and retaining good employees; more effective business and financial planning; enhanced revenues through attaining socially conscious consumers, access to financial capital from sustainability-oriented investors or process innovation [58][59][60]. Thus, corporate sustainability has the potential to deliver a broad range of new sources of competitive advantage that affect value creation in both the short term and longer term [61].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A company that is consistently socially, environmentally, and financially responsible should ultimately obtain tangible benefits from such responsibility in the form of: cost reductions through decreased regulatory or litigation risk and higher material and energy efficiency; more stable relations with the financial community and stakeholders; increased productivity through attracting and retaining good employees; more effective business and financial planning; enhanced revenues through attaining socially conscious consumers, access to financial capital from sustainability-oriented investors or process innovation [58][59][60]. Thus, corporate sustainability has the potential to deliver a broad range of new sources of competitive advantage that affect value creation in both the short term and longer term [61].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective and efficient Inter-organizations/ intra-organization communication may help in sharing of innovative ideas, schedule, trainee and activities to implement GSCM (Etzion, 2007;Cooper, 1994). Better communication, coordination and strong infrastructure may help in developing healthy organizational culture for the implementation of GSCM (Christmann, 2000;Del Brio & Junguera, 2003;Wu & Hang, 2009).…”
Section: Information Quality and Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Astra Strategy looks almost identical to the Triple Bottom Line concept, where a company is not merely oriented to good (positive) financial performance, but also considers ecological sustainability and social sustainability [10,11]. However, Astra does not adopt the Triple Bottom Line concept in a whole.…”
Section: Kne Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%