2019
DOI: 10.4414/smw.2019.20007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of volume substitution in patients with septic and haemorrhagic shock with respect to the microcirculation

Abstract: This review describes the evidence relating to fluid resuscitation in sepsis, septic shock and massive haemorrhage. Beside the scientific evidence based on clinical trials, possible effects on the microcirculation and, therefore, organ function will be illustrated and areas of future research highlighted. The critical appraisal of the existing evidence should enable the reader to choose the optimal volume substitution for an individual patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the volume of fluid between OMX and vehicle was matched, OMX is a PEGylated protein-containing product, and both protein and PEG have oncotic properties; thus, neither protein-nor PEGrelated oncotic pressures were controlled. In the absence of blood products, various methods to replace volume and increase oncotic pressure have been extensively evaluated, with no clear benefit to colloid over crystalloid replacement for shock resuscitation (49)(50)(51)(52). Second, although biochemical surrogates of oxygen delivery were measured, cardiac output was not directly determined during these studies, negating the ability to directly calculate vascular resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the volume of fluid between OMX and vehicle was matched, OMX is a PEGylated protein-containing product, and both protein and PEG have oncotic properties; thus, neither protein-nor PEGrelated oncotic pressures were controlled. In the absence of blood products, various methods to replace volume and increase oncotic pressure have been extensively evaluated, with no clear benefit to colloid over crystalloid replacement for shock resuscitation (49)(50)(51)(52). Second, although biochemical surrogates of oxygen delivery were measured, cardiac output was not directly determined during these studies, negating the ability to directly calculate vascular resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, based on our observations, it seems that in the event of a delay in providing HR and achieving surgical control, balanced crystalloids may be a better choice than colloids for replenishing lost intravascular volume. Even more so, since the supposedly superior volume effect of gelatines is repeatedly undermined [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isotonic and hypertonic crystalloid solutions continue to be investigated in order to rapidly restore hemodynamics, reduce the amount of fluid administered in order minimize hemodilution, and tissue edema, and lessen the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation ( 58 62 , 236 , 237 ). Novel therapies that mimic natural hemostatic mechanisms ( 68 ) or reduce vascular leakage ( 238 240 ) are being developed and solutions that increase tissue oxygenation (e.g., hemoglobin) and restore microcirculatory blood flow continue to evolve ( 241 243 ). Future fluids should protect or repair the endothelium ( 224 , 228 , 238 , 244 , 245 ).…”
Section: New Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%