2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-003-3039-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Scintimammography in Reduction Mammaplasties: A Preliminary Study

Abstract: Reduction mammaplasty results in architectural distortion, fat necrosis, and heavy scarring of the breast. In such conditions, mammography (MG) might not be reliable and an alternative unfailing imaging technique is demanded to prevent unnecessary apprehension and biopsy. With this study, the value of Tc-99m sestamibi (MIBI) scintimammography (SCM) as an adjunct test after reduction mammaplasty was explored. MIBI scintigraphy is not affected by scar tissue or breast density and is able to differentiate benign … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with mammography, the sensitivity of 99mTc sestamibi scintimammography is independent of breast density [8][9][10]. In addition, scintimammography has not shown increased uptake in women with architectural distortion or scarring from a prior procedure [11]. 99mTc sestamibi scintimammography performed with a general-purpose gamma camera is limited by the inability to reliably image cancers smaller than 1 cm, owing to its intrinsic resolution with a sensitivity for these lesions of 35-65% [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In comparison with mammography, the sensitivity of 99mTc sestamibi scintimammography is independent of breast density [8][9][10]. In addition, scintimammography has not shown increased uptake in women with architectural distortion or scarring from a prior procedure [11]. 99mTc sestamibi scintimammography performed with a general-purpose gamma camera is limited by the inability to reliably image cancers smaller than 1 cm, owing to its intrinsic resolution with a sensitivity for these lesions of 35-65% [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%