2014
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of plant functional groups in demonstrating and communicating vegetation responses to environmental flows

Abstract: Summary This study compares the effectiveness of using plant species, genera, family or water plant functional group (WPFG) classifications for demonstrating differences in vegetation communities associated with inundation history. Vegetation surveys were undertaken annually for 5 years from 2007–2008 to 2011–2012 at 18 floodplain wetlands. These wetlands are from two geographically separate locations situated along the lower Murray River. Wetlands have different inundation histories and have received varied… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have used ‘habitat preference guilds’ such as wetland indicator groups that synthesise the combination of traits that adapt plants to different levels of water availability (Stromberg et al ., ; Goebel, Pregitzer & Palik, ; Laidig et al ., ). Such studies help us understand how non‐phylogenetic groups respond to hydrologic changes, such as shifts from perennial to intermittent flows, but the need to capture the causal mechanisms underlying habitat preferences and tolerances remains (Merritt et al ., ; Campbell, Johns & Nielsen, ). Traits that reflect productivity and growth rate, regeneration processes, storage and defence all are important when identifying suites of species adapted to riparian conditions (Hunt et al ., ; Aguiar et al ., ; Verberk, van Noordwijk & Hildrew, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have used ‘habitat preference guilds’ such as wetland indicator groups that synthesise the combination of traits that adapt plants to different levels of water availability (Stromberg et al ., ; Goebel, Pregitzer & Palik, ; Laidig et al ., ). Such studies help us understand how non‐phylogenetic groups respond to hydrologic changes, such as shifts from perennial to intermittent flows, but the need to capture the causal mechanisms underlying habitat preferences and tolerances remains (Merritt et al ., ; Campbell, Johns & Nielsen, ). Traits that reflect productivity and growth rate, regeneration processes, storage and defence all are important when identifying suites of species adapted to riparian conditions (Hunt et al ., ; Aguiar et al ., ; Verberk, van Noordwijk & Hildrew, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the multi-million dollar investments in monitoring, ecological responses to eflows in the Murray River have been inconsistent, site and taxon specific and sometimes difficult to detect (e.g. Campbell, Johns, & Nielsen, 2014;Vivian, Marshall, & Godfree, 2014;Zampatti & Leigh, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, all of our community‐level metrics demonstrated either no change, or a net decrease, in taxonomic richness by the end of our study. These negative responses are likely to be associated with the terrestrialisation of the floodplain vegetation in the Hattah Lakes system due to long dry phases (Bino et al., ; Campbell et al., ; Colloff & Baldwin, ), and the adverse response of dry‐land taxa to prolonged inundation (Capon, ; Casanova & Brock, ; Nishihiro, Miyawaki, Fujiwara, & Washitani, ; Raulings, Morris, Roache, & Boon, ; Webb, de Little, Miller, & Stewardson, ). This was evidenced by the dominance of terrestrial dry and damp taxa in our study area, and the tendency for these groups to respond negatively to the flood, as well as the low abundance of amphibious plant taxa in this system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%