Abstract:Investment in the innovation of environmental sustainability in construction has been encouraged due to the industry's resource-intensity. However, it remains unclear how to convince shareholders and construction companies to invest in environmental innovations.This research used the event study method with a sample of 129 announcements in the construction industry from 2011 to 2017 to investigate the relationship between incremental environmental sustainability innovation and the stock market reactions of con… Show more
“…Natural resources play a key role in some firms’ strategic decisions (Hart, 1995) and in their centrality to several SDGs that challenge firms to make bold changes in their use of such finite resources (Bringezu & Bleischwitz, 2017; UN, 2015b; United Nations Environment Program, 2011). For example, Duong and colleagues’ (2021) recent analysis on the construction sector underscores the urgency of transforming high resource-intensive industries into more sustainable ones; a call that is shared by a number of other scholars (e.g., Kajander et al, 2012; Tan et al, 2015). Other recent studies have singled out firms in natural resource-intensive sectors for study, in part due to the scrutiny placed on major emitters of greenhouse gases (e.g., Cho et al, 2018; Talbot & Borial, 2018).…”
In 2015, the United Nations launched the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in collaboration with civil society and firms, recognizing that leading firms have the potential to innovate bold solutions at scale to achieve global sustainability. Exploring the impact of the SDGs’ launch on firms, through the lens of normative pressure, we apply computer-aided text analysis to the language used in sustainability reports of 164 large corporations to investigate whether and how the SDGs impacted sustainability reporting. Results show that, when comparing firms’ sustainability reports before and after 2015, increasing alignment was observed with the language of certain SDGs, while alignment did not significantly change for other SDGs. We further analyze these changes across industries, natural resource intensity levels, and geo-institutional contexts, revealing variation among firms based on institutional characteristics that may point to selection priorities and critical gaps as global firms engage with the grand challenges embodied in the SDGs. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M14
“…Natural resources play a key role in some firms’ strategic decisions (Hart, 1995) and in their centrality to several SDGs that challenge firms to make bold changes in their use of such finite resources (Bringezu & Bleischwitz, 2017; UN, 2015b; United Nations Environment Program, 2011). For example, Duong and colleagues’ (2021) recent analysis on the construction sector underscores the urgency of transforming high resource-intensive industries into more sustainable ones; a call that is shared by a number of other scholars (e.g., Kajander et al, 2012; Tan et al, 2015). Other recent studies have singled out firms in natural resource-intensive sectors for study, in part due to the scrutiny placed on major emitters of greenhouse gases (e.g., Cho et al, 2018; Talbot & Borial, 2018).…”
In 2015, the United Nations launched the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in collaboration with civil society and firms, recognizing that leading firms have the potential to innovate bold solutions at scale to achieve global sustainability. Exploring the impact of the SDGs’ launch on firms, through the lens of normative pressure, we apply computer-aided text analysis to the language used in sustainability reports of 164 large corporations to investigate whether and how the SDGs impacted sustainability reporting. Results show that, when comparing firms’ sustainability reports before and after 2015, increasing alignment was observed with the language of certain SDGs, while alignment did not significantly change for other SDGs. We further analyze these changes across industries, natural resource intensity levels, and geo-institutional contexts, revealing variation among firms based on institutional characteristics that may point to selection priorities and critical gaps as global firms engage with the grand challenges embodied in the SDGs. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M14
“…The emergence of strategic alliances is a consequence of global economic integration, manifested through voluntary cooperation agreements between two or more companies (Duong et al, 2021; Lin & Darnall, 2010). These agreements empower participating companies to attain objectives that an individual entity could not achieve solely due to its restricted capabilities (Ferreira, Coelho, & Moutinho, 2021; Kohtamäki et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
This article aims to examine the influence of green strategic alliances (GSA) on both green radical and incremental innovation through the effects of green supply chain integration (GSCI). A theoretical model was proposed and evaluated using structural equation modeling. A 37‐item questionnaire was created to assess the proposed relationships, and a total of 303 valid responses were obtained from a sample of industrial and service companies in China. The findings indicate that GSA have a positive impact on GSCI, and thus, on both green radical and green incremental innovation. This study also explores the role of strategic alliances in corporate green innovation, and how members of alliances can benefit from superior green innovation through shared value creation. The authors innovatively adopt the frameworks of value creation and stakeholder theory to explain how supply chain (knowledge, technology, and processes) can aid firms in achieving green radical and incremental innovation.
“…Such an analysis could be applied as a part of methodology for developing the means for supporting the Green Deal objectives. The study of Duong et al (2021) [70] revealed that there is a positive stock market reaction to incremental sustainability innovation; however, there is a lack of studies that focus on the analysis of the investor behaviour in the context of changes in the market.…”
This research is dedicated to the modelling of decision process occurring during the implementation of construction projects. Recent studies generally do not assess the robustness of the decisions regarding the possible changes during the construction project implementation. However, such an assessment might increase the reliability of the decision-making process. We addressed this gap through a new model that combines the decision-making process modelling with the AHP method and includes the analysis of model stability concerning stakeholders’ behaviour. We used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Decision tree methods to model the decision-making process. The proposed model was validated on a case study of multiple construction projects. The assessment was performed from individual investor’s and independent expert’s perspectives. The criteria for the assessment were selected according to the principles of sustainability. We performed the sensitivity analysis, making it possible to assess the possible changes of the decisions depending on the potential patterns of the decision-makers’ behaviour. The results of the study show that, sometimes, small fluctuations in the project factors affect the project selection indicating the possible lack of the robustness of the project decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.