2016
DOI: 10.1159/000453267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Frontal Planar QRS-T Angle in Patients without Angiographically Apparent Atherosclerosis

Abstract: Objective: The present study was undertaken to investigate the prognostic value of the frontal planar QRS-T angle in patients without angiographically apparent coronary atherosclerosis. Subjects and Methods: Three hundred and seven patients with normal coronary arteries on coronary angiography were included. The absolute difference between the frontal QRS- and T-wave axes was defined as the frontal planar QRS-T angle, and patients were divided into 3 subgroups based on the frontal planar QRS-T angle (<45, 45-9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Normally, the directions of the myocardial depolarization axis and repolarization axis is in the similar orientation. Therefore, f(QRS-T) angle often tend to be a narrow angle (<45°) (Gungor et al, 2017;Raposeiras-Roubin et al, 2014;Tan et al, 2017). A wider f(QRS-T) angle is associated with discordance between ventricular depolarization phase and repolarization phase and it was found to be associated with poor outcomes in different populations (Pavri et al, 2008;Raposeiras-Roubin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally, the directions of the myocardial depolarization axis and repolarization axis is in the similar orientation. Therefore, f(QRS-T) angle often tend to be a narrow angle (<45°) (Gungor et al, 2017;Raposeiras-Roubin et al, 2014;Tan et al, 2017). A wider f(QRS-T) angle is associated with discordance between ventricular depolarization phase and repolarization phase and it was found to be associated with poor outcomes in different populations (Pavri et al, 2008;Raposeiras-Roubin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no certain reference range for a normal fpQRS-T angle, some studies opt to regard a fpQRS-T angle <45 degrees as normal, between 45-90 degrees as borderline and >90 degrees as abnormal [11,16,37]. In their study, Chua et al [16] pointed out to a cut-off value >90 degrees for a fpQRS-T angle to predict sudden cardiac death independently of the left ventricular ejection fraction in a large cohort of patients possessing cardiovascular disease risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Независимые предикторы увеличения фронтального угла QRS-T у лиц с интактными коронарными артериями -корригированный интервал QT, АГ и увеличение диаметра ствола левой коронарной артерии (M. Gungor и соавт., 2017) [39], а у лиц с ожирением -ИМТ и масса миокарда ЛЖ (S. Kurisu и соавт., 2018) [40].…”
Section: ìåõàíèçìû óâåëè÷åíèÿ óãëà Qrs-tunclassified