fQRS and QRS distortion may be useful for identifying patients at higher cardiac risk. fQRS can foresee thrombolytic therapy failure and three vessels disease whereas QRS distortion does not possess such quality. These findings may guide the physician deciding initial treatment modality in STEMI.

Frontal QRS-T angle is independent predictor of non-dipper status in hypertensive patients without LVH.

No abstract

Several laboratory parameters have been used to assess inflammatory process and determine cardiovascular risk. The C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel marker of inflammation and its clinical importance has not been clearly elucidated in coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the diagnostic value of CAR with other inflammatory parameters in detecting significant CAD. Patients (n = 421) with stable angina pectoris who underwent coronary angiography for the suspected CAD were included. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio, uric acid, monocyte to high-density cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, mean platelet volume to lymphocyte ratio (MPVLR), and platelet to mean corpuscular volume (MCV) ratio were measured. Patients with significant CAD had a significantly higher NLR ( P = .043), MLR ( P = .004), uric acid ( P < .001), monocyte to HDL-C ratio ( P = .004), and CAR ( P < .001) compared to patients without significant CAD. However, MPVLR and platelet to MCV ratio weren’t different between 2 groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of CAR was the highest AUC among all inflammatory parameters for predicting significant CAD. Multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.046, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.020-1.072, P < .001) and CAR (OR: 1.175, 95% CI, 1.126-1.226, P < .001) were the only independent predictors of significant CAD. In conclusion, CAR had the strongest diagnostic value in detecting significant CAD among the inflammatory parameters evaluated in this study.

f(QRS-T) angle may be used as a beneficial tool for determining high risk patients in acute STEMI. Unlike previous studies, we showed for the first time that that post-procedural f(QRS-T) can predict in-hospital mortality and TT failure.

What is known and objective: Propofol is a most commonly used anaesthetic drug for conscious sedation in outpatient procedures. Previous studies have shown that propofol may affect ventricular repolarization based on QT and Tp-e intervals. Frontal QRS-T angle is a marker of ventricular depolarization and repolarization difference. However, there is no study investigating the effect of propofol on frontal QRS-T angle. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of propofol on frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing colonoscopy procedure. Method: A total of 56 patients (53.5% females) who underwent colonoscopy procedure were included in this study. All patients underwent 12-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) just before colonoscopy and 15 minutes after colonoscopy. QT interval, QTc interval, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT, Tp-e/QTc and frontal QRS-T angle were calculated from 12-lead ECGs. Results and discussion: The frontal QRS-T angle was significantly increased 15 minutes after colonoscopy compared to basal value (36.2 ± 24.3 vs. 29.5 ± 23.6, P = .003). In addition, repolarization parameters including QT, QTc and Tp-e intervals were significantly prolonged at 15 minutes after colonoscopy compared to basal value, except Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc. Significant ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias were not observed in any patient during the procedure. What is new and conclusion: In this study, we found that propofol administration increased the frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing colonoscopy procedure. Given that a prolonged frontal QRS-T angle is associated with ventricular arrhythmias, it may be safer to monitor those patients receiving propofol during colonoscopy procedures.

BackgroundQRS fragmentation (fQRS) is classically defined as the presence of slurred QRS morphology in at least two contiguous leads, and its prognostic importance has been shown in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, no study has investigated the significance of single lead fQRS (sl-fQRS) in surface electrocardiography (ECG).ObjectivesTo evaluate whether sl-fQRS is as valuable as classical fQRS in patients with acute STEMI who had successful revascularization with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).MethodsWe included 330 patients with a first STEMI who had been successfully revascularized with pPCI. The patient’s electrocardiography was obtained in the first 48 hours, and the patients were divided into three groups according to the absence of fQRS (no-fQRS); fQRS presence in a single lead (sl-fQRS); and ≥2 leads with fQRS (classical fQRS).ResultsIn-hospital mortality was significantly higher both in patients with sl-fQRS and in patients with ≥ 2 leads with fQRS compared to patients with no-fQRS. In ROC curve analysis, ≥ 1 leads with fQRS yielded a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 57.4% for the prediction of in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that sl-fQRS is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR: 3.989, 95% CI: 1.237-12.869, p = 0.021).ConclusionsAlthough the concept of at least two derivations is mentioned for the classical definition of fQRS, our study showed that fQRS in only one lead is also associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, ≥1 leads with fQRS can be useful when describing the patients under high cardiac risk in acute STEMI.

The relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with acute coronary syndrome has been reported. However, the relevance of CAR in patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) has not been clarified. We hypothesized that CAR might predict the development of CIN in patients with SAP undergoing coronary angiography (CAG). Patients ( n = 554) with SAP who underwent CAG were included in the study. CIN was defined as a ≥25% increase in serum creatinine compared with baseline value within 72 h of CAG. Participants were divided into two groups: CIN ( n = 87) and non-CIN ( n = 467). Age, CRP, CAR, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), urea, uric acid, contrast medium volume, the percent of percutaneous coronary intervention were significantly greater, whereas albumin and high-density lipoprotein were significantly lower in the CIN group than non-CIN group ( p < .05, for all). Multivariate analysis showed that CAR was the only independent predictor for CIN (odds ratio = 7.065, 95% confidence interval (CI); 3.279–15.221, p < .001). Receiver operating characteristic ROC analysis showed that a CAR ≥ 0.1164 could predict CIN (sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 72%; area under curve = 0.736; 95% CI: 0.677–0.795, p < .001). CAR was significantly greater in patients who developed CIN and this independently predicted CIN.