The value of buyback contract under price competition

Xue, Weili; Hu, Yulin; Chen, Zhiyuan

doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1544425

Cited by 19 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A supply chain with high supply reliability has higher order quantity and a stronger competitive advantage [ 44 , 45 ]. An investigation of supply chain cooperation under the conditions of sharing and not sharing advertising information found that the sharing of advertising information can improve the overall performance of the supply chain [ 46 , 47 ]. Once the information entering the market is known by competitors, private brands’ rivals will change their original operation strategies [ 48 , 49 ].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operation decision of competitive mining supply chain based on social responsibility

Wang

2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of the green economy has significantly impact the traditional mining industry. Mining enterprises must invest in green technology to reduce the environmental pollution caused by flying dust and soil erosion and are subject to increased scrutiny to be socially responsible when conducting their business. To address this issue, we consider a competitive mining supply chain system consisting of two excavators and two exclusive retailers. Among them, the excavators have a certain sense of corporate social responsibility (CSR), that is, in addition to pursuing economic profits, they also consciously pay attention to the interests of consumers. We establish three different game models that two excavators exhibit no CSR behaviour (NN), two excavators exhibit CSR behaviour (SS) and one excavator exhibits CSR behaviour (SN). We examine the optimal decision-making strategies and analyse the impact of social responsibility. Analytical results show that the optimal strategies of mining supply chain are different under different supply chain structures. The optimal decisions of the mining supply chain members are the same in each case under the NN and SS models. In the SN model, the optimal decision strategy value of mining supply chain members is always greater than non-socially responsible supply chain members. In SS model, when the intensity of social responsibility competition is low, two excavators reduce the wholesale price, and retailers reduce the sales price; when the intensity of social responsibility competition is strong, two excavators will increase the wholesale price, and retailers will increase the sales price. These help to promote product sales and increase the profits of the supply chain system. In SN model, with the increase of social responsibility competition intensity, the wholesale price of two excavators and the sales price of retailers first increased and then decreased. Finally, numerical examples illustrated to justify the proposed model.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operation decision of competitive mining supply chain based on social responsibility

Wang

2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Xu et al (2019) explore how one rational retailer competes with one overconfident retailer without being aware of the latter's overconfidence. Xue et al (2019) discuss whether a manufacturer should provide buyback contracts to competing distributors. Park et al (2020) examine the price competition between two retailers following everyday low price strategy and high-low pricing strategy, respectively.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint pricing and replenishment policies for risk‐averse retailers under duopolistic competition

Zhang

Yue

2021

Manage Decis Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the coordination of pricing and inventory replenishment under retail competition. Although conventional wisdom suggests that a retailer follow conservative operating strategies when the competing retailer adopts a markdown strategy, the retailer may actually raise its price (order) if its operational costs are sufficiently high (low) and its competitor's price is relatively low. If the retailer is more risk averse, its pricing and replenishment decisions hinge highly on its risk aversion level and its competitor's current price. The increase of the wholesale price always hurts the retailers and may even hurt the manufacturer if it is exorbitant.

show abstract

“…Considering channel disruption, Aslani and Heydari [47] proposed a transshipment contract to coordinate the enterprises in the supply chain which guarantees the profitability of each player. Xue et al [48] explored the value of a buyback contract by analyzing a model which includes one manufacturer and two competing retailers. The results showed that the asymmetric contract structure is better off for the whole supply chain.…”

Section: Supply Chain Coordinationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint Emission Reduction Strategy in Green Supply Chain under Environmental Regulation

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the threat of global warming, joint emission reduction strategy has been widely adopted as an effective solution for the industry to guarantee environmental sustainability. In the practice of supply chain, environmental regulations and supply chain contracts are applied with the attempt to improve environmental performance. However, whether these measures are actually effective remains unanswered. In this paper, we study a supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer adopting joint emission reduction strategy. We first investigate under what circumstance the environmental regulation can effectively result in higher emission reduction efforts. The result shows that when the cost coefficient satisfies certain conditions, the increase of penalty or subsidy can lead to more investment in emission reduction. In addition, if the environmental impact caused by the production process is extremely high, the enforcement of the regulation is ineffective. We also explore how the cost-revenue-sharing contract affects the emission reduction strategy and the coordination of the members in the supply chain. The results suggest that the incentive effect of environmental regulation is more effective when the supply chain coordination contract exists. Numerical experiments are also presented to verify our analytical conclusions.

show abstract

The value of buyback contract under price competition

Cited by 19 publications

References 21 publications

Operation decision of competitive mining supply chain based on social responsibility

Operation decision of competitive mining supply chain based on social responsibility

Joint pricing and replenishment policies for risk‐averse retailers under duopolistic competition

Joint Emission Reduction Strategy in Green Supply Chain under Environmental Regulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About