2013
DOI: 10.1177/1354068813509525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of the RILE left–right index as a measure of party policy

Abstract: The RILE index of the manifesto dataset is a popular but controversial estimate of parties' left-right positions. It has been thoroughly criticized, yet a basic question of its validity has not been addressed. In the current article I argue that for the index to be valid, patterns of association presumed by the logic of the index must be present in the data used to calculate it. I apply canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to test these associations within and between the sets of variables that form the left-r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this measure has occasionally been criticized (see Gemenis, 2013 for an overview), it remains widely used and has almost achieved a monopoly status in the field (Laver and Garry, 2000: 620). Importantly, in a thorough review and analysis of the measure, Mölder (2013) finds that it is valid for countries that have not experienced a communist past, which is what I am concerned with in this article. To measure the effect of parties’ economic and policy preferences, the article uses the composite CMP measure of how favourable a party is to a free-market economy 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although this measure has occasionally been criticized (see Gemenis, 2013 for an overview), it remains widely used and has almost achieved a monopoly status in the field (Laver and Garry, 2000: 620). Importantly, in a thorough review and analysis of the measure, Mölder (2013) finds that it is valid for countries that have not experienced a communist past, which is what I am concerned with in this article. To measure the effect of parties’ economic and policy preferences, the article uses the composite CMP measure of how favourable a party is to a free-market economy 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In particular, Alt et al (2006) and Rios et al (2016) used a binary measure of conservative or liberal party ideology in power. However, scholars have challenged the validity and reliability of cross-national ideological measures (Molder, 2013). According to Benoit and Laver (2006) “it may be impossible for any single scale to measure this dimension in a manner that can be used for reliable or meaningful cross-national comparison” (p. 158).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All descriptions and measures entail some reliability concerns when linking social strata to political parties. Classification by criteria derived from a century or more ago can result in evaluation errors (McDonald & Budge, 2014;Mölder, 2016). Policies adjust and public attitudes are capricious.…”
Section: What Is the 'Middle'?mentioning
confidence: 99%