The validity and reliability of a tool for measuring educational innovative thinking competencies

Morad, Sigal; Ragonis, Noa; Barak, Miri

doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103193

Cited by 17 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Schools where teachers with innovative work behavior support will be able to carry out better learning (Johari et al, 2021), especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research confirms that through principal leadership and learning organization, innovative work behavior of teachers may potentially be improved towards teachers who are more capable of seeking ideas and implementing new ideas, making learning better, loving challenges (Oliveira et al, 2019), creating various alternative learning methods (Morad et al, 2021), doing reflection (Patterson et al, 2009), and struggling for the idea/product for others' acceptance (Middleton & Hall, 2021).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 61%

The Effect of Principals’ Leadership and Learning Organization on Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Hidayat

Patras

2022

Tadris

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research explores evidence of the conceptual model related to principals' leadership, learning organization, and teachers' innovative work behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research applied a survey method in which participants employed selections through the purposive sampling technique. There were 1243 respondents in this sample. Subsequently, 1200 were then used to elicit further data. The data collection procedure was carried out online by distributing questionnaires to teachers in Indonesia via the Google Form application. The questionnaire was made based on theoretical studies, expert judgments, and readability assessments, where the analysis of research data employs the so-called path analysis with SMART PLS. The findings of this research evidence the following cases. First, principals' leadership has a positive and significant direct influence on teachers' innovative work behavior. Second, principals' leadership has a positive and significant direct influence on learning organizations. Third, learning organization has a positive and significant direct influence on the teachers' innovative work behavior. Fourth, principals' leadership through learning organization has a positive and significant indirect influence on the teachers' innovative work behavior. These findings support the notion that is improving teachers' innovative work behavior, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, requires improvement of principals' leadership and the learning organization.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 61%

The Effect of Principals’ Leadership and Learning Organization on Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Hidayat

Patras

2022

Tadris

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analysis of the data obtained in this study includes analysis of validity, reliability, power differences, and difficulty levels of instruments. Instrumentality is essential for perfecting instruments in the accurate decision-making of something to measure (Blazquez et al, 2017;Morad et al, 2021;Vial et al, 2021). The instrument validity analysis consisted of a content validity test and an item validity test.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Concept of Heat Transfer measured by Cognitive Domain Assessment Instruments

Yuniasih

Yudiana

Japa

2021

JISD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The lack of availability in assessment instruments used and unmet cognitive levels of C3-C6 resulted in poor quality assessments. This study aims to develop cognitive domain assessment instruments on the concept of heat transfer material in grade V elementary school. This research was development research that used 4D models (Four-D models) to define, design, develop, and disseminate. The subject of study was the assessment instrument of the cognitive realm with the object of research, that was the instrument quality. Measurement of the validity of the content was done on two experts/judges using the non-test method and instruments of the expert validity sheet. Instrument quality measurement was conducted with field trials of 106 students using multiple-choice objective test instruments. The content validity data obtained were analyzed with the Gregory formula, while the field test result data analyzed the validity of the grain, reliability, different power, and difficulty level. The results showed that the validity of the content obtained by 0.97 (very high) with the test results of the item's validity got 30 points of the question was declared valid. The instrument reliability index was developed by 0.85 (very high). The average coefficient of different power obtained is 0.51 (good) with a test device difficulty of 0.52 (medium). The result demonstrated cognitive domain assessment instruments that were developed feasible and can be used in conducting learning assessments in the cognitive realm.

show abstract

“…The sharp decline in Figure 1 described the factor that dominated the variances. Figure 1 can be used as the indicator of the dominant factor in the case that there is a rapid difference between components 1 and 2 [22].…”

Section: Phase 2: Construct Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability Analysis of HOTS Multiple Choice Questions in a Chemistry Course at a Senior High School

Syafitri,

Simorangkir,

Sudrajat

2024

KSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the validity and reliability of a newly developed multiple-choice evaluation system that measured students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). The instrument test consisted of 45 multiple-choice items and was developed based on the cognitive domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy. A quantitative method was used. It consisted of three phases: Content Validity by inter-rater agreement, Construct Validity by principal component analysis (PCA), and Reliability shown by Chronbach’s alpha. The content validity by inter-rater agreement found that the instrument was categorized as valid. The construct validity by PCA found that each item in the evaluation instrument measured one-dimensionality, which is good to be used as an evaluation instrument test. The reliability was established to be a high degree with Chronbach’s Alpha being 0.94. From the result of this study, a valid and reliable HOTS multiple-choice item evaluation instrument has been produced and is ready to be tested in a small sample to examine its empirical quality. Keywords: validity, reliability, multiple-choice, evaluation system

show abstract

The validity and reliability of a tool for measuring educational innovative thinking competencies

Cited by 17 publications

References 52 publications

The Effect of Principals’ Leadership and Learning Organization on Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Effect of Principals’ Leadership and Learning Organization on Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Concept of Heat Transfer measured by Cognitive Domain Assessment Instruments

Validity and Reliability Analysis of HOTS Multiple Choice Questions in a Chemistry Course at a Senior High School

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About