2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utilization of Joint Mobilization As Part of a Comprehensive Program to Manage Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this meta-analysis are consistent with the previous systematic reviews that showed positive effects after manual therapy treatment on symptoms and function in patients with CTS [21,29,[31][32][33]. In these reviews, the intervention included all conservative treatments, whereas in this meta-analysis, the effect of manual therapy interventions in isolation was analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results of this meta-analysis are consistent with the previous systematic reviews that showed positive effects after manual therapy treatment on symptoms and function in patients with CTS [21,29,[31][32][33]. In these reviews, the intervention included all conservative treatments, whereas in this meta-analysis, the effect of manual therapy interventions in isolation was analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Manual therapy can im- prove the local range of motion and mechanosensitivity, reduce spinal cord hyperexcitability, and facilitate modu- lation of the central nervous system pain processing [ 82 ]. In various studies, groups that integrated joint mobili- zation performed better than the control group in pain reduction, subjective symptoms, and functional status [ 83 , 84 ] but no difference was found in 2-point discrimi- nation [ 85 ]. Cadaveric studies discovered that neuro- dynamic techniques are effective on fluid dispersion in the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel, with no difference between sliding and tensioning [ 86 ].…”
Section: Conservative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%