2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10140-019-01693-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of whole spine survey MRI in blunt trauma patients sustaining single level or contiguous spinal fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, multilevel contiguous osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures have been described 31 . Also in non-osteoporotic patients multilevel vertebral injuries are common and incidences around 20-30% have been reported [32][33][34] . Especially occult, non-continuous vertebral injuries bare the risk of delayed diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, multilevel contiguous osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures have been described 31 . Also in non-osteoporotic patients multilevel vertebral injuries are common and incidences around 20-30% have been reported [32][33][34] . Especially occult, non-continuous vertebral injuries bare the risk of delayed diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Besides the initial diagnostic with conventional radiography and CT, the gold standard for diagnosing bone marrow edema and disc edema, such as in nondisplaced spine trauma, is MRI, although its ability to detect fractures may vary depending on the etiology, namely osteoporotic versus malignant causes. 1,33 MRI identifies subtle bony edema seen in compression fractures that would otherwise be missed by conventional radiography. For stress fractures in the lumbar spine, the sensitivity was reported at 99.6%, specificity at 86.7%, and accuracy at 97.2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the gold standard for the detection of vertebral injuries and relevant soft tissue injury is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 1 In an acutely injured spine, MRI is better able to detect diagnoses, such as bone marrow edema or acute spinal stenosis. However, use of MRI is limited by its time-intensive nature and high costs, and patients need to be free of any implanted metal devices, such as pacemakers or brain stimulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one recent study, findings on MRI changed management plans relatively infrequently in patients with thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. 49 In another recent study, 18.5% of patients with single-level or contiguous vertebral fractures were found to have additional injuries on MRI, although the majority were bone contusions or simple compression fractures which did not alter management planning. 50 In patients with no fracture on CT, MRI of the cervical spine warrants consideration in patients with symptoms of central cord syndrome or midline tenderness and equivocal findings on CT. 51 Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine can visualize soft tissue injury and is widely utilized to determine ligamentous stability in the unevaluable trauma patient, though clinical practice is variable (Figure 13).…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A number of complications have also been reported including but not limiting to misplaced access, soft tissue or articular cavity extravasation, compartment syndrome, or fat marrow pulmonary emboli. 48,49…”
Section: Technical Considerations In Wbctmentioning
confidence: 99%