1993
DOI: 10.2307/1170497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 This debate is far from over. Although researchers have questioned MBTI measures in other contexts, 7 the tool is still one of the most popular for ascertaining personality types, especially because extensive data supports its findings. The instrument itself doesn't predict career successit merely identifies occupational preferencesbut personality has a great impact on a worker's motivation, performance, and retention in the field.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 This debate is far from over. Although researchers have questioned MBTI measures in other contexts, 7 the tool is still one of the most popular for ascertaining personality types, especially because extensive data supports its findings. The instrument itself doesn't predict career successit merely identifies occupational preferencesbut personality has a great impact on a worker's motivation, performance, and retention in the field.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its primary model is a typology of four personality types, having some similarity to Bartle's model, but unfortunately it is based on the Myers-Briggs personality system. Despite its popularity with human relations consultants to American corporations, MyersBriggs is poorly supported by research (Druckman & Bjork, 1991;Pettinger, 1993). Better would have been the Big Five model of personality dimensions, which has received extensive support in a wide range of scientific studies (Wiggins, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that a number of researchers have criticized the use of the MBTI for individual differences research (Comrey, 1983;Pittenger, 1993;Vacha-Haase & Thompson, 2002). In particular, McCrae and Costa (1989) argue that the MBTI does not adequately measure distinct personality types, but instead could be conceptualized as measuring four of the five relatively independent personality dimensions outlined by the Five Factor Model (FFM; Costa & McCrae, 1992.…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%