2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-017-0433-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utility of Routine Intensive Care Admission for Patients Undergoing Intracranial Neurosurgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Our systematic review demonstrates that routine postoperative ICU admission may not benefit carefully selected patients who have undergone elective intracranial neurosurgical procedures. In addition, limiting routine ICU admission may result in significant cost savings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,7-9,11,12,17 Others have suggested comparable regimens could reduce costs. 2,8,12,13 Previous reported selection criteria for reduced postoperative monitoring were quite strict (eg age <65, small tumors, no comorbidity 13 ), whereas we chose to allow all supratentorial tumor cases to be admitted to the general neurosurgical ward, except when the surgeon or anesthesiologist judged otherwise based on expected duration of surgery, expected blood loss, comorbidities, and functional status. Even though selection might be more subjective this way, more patients can be included in the new regimen, which we have shown is safe; therefore, we do not see a need for more stringent criteria for ICU/MCU admission postcraniotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2,7-9,11,12,17 Others have suggested comparable regimens could reduce costs. 2,8,12,13 Previous reported selection criteria for reduced postoperative monitoring were quite strict (eg age <65, small tumors, no comorbidity 13 ), whereas we chose to allow all supratentorial tumor cases to be admitted to the general neurosurgical ward, except when the surgeon or anesthesiologist judged otherwise based on expected duration of surgery, expected blood loss, comorbidities, and functional status. Even though selection might be more subjective this way, more patients can be included in the new regimen, which we have shown is safe; therefore, we do not see a need for more stringent criteria for ICU/MCU admission postcraniotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this can result in significant savings. 2,8,12,13 In our hospital, 1-d admittance to ICU or MCU costs €2154 and €1421, respectively, whereas a day at the neurosurgical ward costs €395. This has to be balanced against potential increases in complication and length of stay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, the need for post-operative admittance to medium or intensive care units after craniotomy was challenged [1][2][3][4][6][7][8]. The main reason for changing the post-operative regimen was the fact that patients on average reported quick recovery after tumor craniotomy, but complained about the burden of the stay at the ICU post-operatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%