The usefulness of unsupervised classification methods for landscape typification: The case of Slovenia

Perko, Drago; Ciglič, Rok; Hrvatin, Mauro

doi:10.3986/ags.7377

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the end, seven landscape types were identified. A 12.5-meter digital elevation model and some artificial intelligence algorithms were used for the first time (Ciglič et al 2019;Perko, Ciglič, and Hrvatin 2019).…”

Section: Comparing the Microtypificationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The authors of this article have already dealt with the evaluation of landscape typology, data layers, and different methods at the theoretical level (Perko 1998a;Ciglič 2012Ciglič , 2018Ciglič and Perko 2012, 2015, 2017Perko, Hrvatin, and Ciglič 2015;Perko, Ciglič, and Hrvatin 2019;Ciglič et al 2019;Perko and Ciglič 2020a), but now, armed with more precise data, the newer methodological steps are even more feasible.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Landscape macrotypologies and microtypologies of Slovenia

Perko

Ciglič

Hrvatin

2021

AGS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work discusses the historical development of landscape typologies of Slovenia, focusing on methodology, terminology, criteria for the division of territory, and landscape type hierarchy. It presents all five macrotypologies of Slovenia created between 1946 and 2013, Slovenia’s classification in nine selected macrotypologies of Europe produced between 1995 and 2016, and eight examples of microtypologies of smaller areas of Slovenia made between 1985 and 2020. It compares and evaluates similar typologies. If, in addition to the landscape typology, a geographical regionalization was also produced, common points are sought between the two. The macrotypologies and microtypologies of Slovenia are accompanied by an original and updated map.

show abstract

Section: Comparing the Microtypificationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Landscape macrotypologies and microtypologies of Slovenia

Perko

Ciglič

Hrvatin

2021

AGS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because if the teacher is not able to prepare material creatively and innovatively, then the teaching and learning process provided by the teacher will be boring. (Chaulin & Duplyakov, 2021;Nemčíková et al, 2020;Perko et al, 2019). Therefore, teachers are very tutored to be creative and innovative in choosing learning methods.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Think Pair Share Method as a Tool to Increase Student Interest and Learning Outcomes

Fernández,

Quintana,

Dominic

et al. 2023

World Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Given the development of learning in this day and age, many schools are using the Think Pair Share type cooperative learning method. Therefore, researchers conducted a study, to see the development of increasing student interest and learning outcomes in using the Think Pair Share method. The type of research conducted by researchers is a quantitative research method with a survey model and in-depth interviews. The results of this study, the Think Pair Share method, can increase students to think and respond. It is a factor of increasing a student's knowledge or ability to respond to questions and increasing the growing sense of helping each other, for example in doing group work. The conclusion of this research is that after applying the coorparative method of Think Pair Share type, the level of cooperation and knowledge of students has increased, but there are still some students who have not experienced an increase in terms of interest or learning outcomes. The limitation of this researcher is that researchers have not been able to find ways to overcome students who have not improved in terms of interest or learning outcomes, therefore researchers hope that future researchers can find ways to overcome students who have not improved

show abstract

Morphogenesis and classification of corrosion plains in Slovenia

Stepišnik,

Ferk

2024

AGS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Raziskava korozijskih uravnav v Sloveniji podaja sistematično klasifikacijo korozijskih uravnav na podlagi njihovih geoloških in morfoloških značilnosti. Klasifikacija jih združuje v štiri kategorije: kraški ravnik, suho kraško polje, robna uravnava kontaktnega krasa in robna uravnava fluviokrasa. Kraški ravniki so največji in nastanejo z denudacijo v stabilnih tektonskih in hidrogeoloških razmerah. Suha kraška polja so zaprte živoskalne kotanje le mestoma prekrite s sedimenti. Robne uravnave kontaktnega krasa so nastale na stiku kraških in nekraških kamnin. Robne uravnave fluviokrasa so nastale z večfaznim razvojem kraških polj zaradi tektonske dejavnosti. Ta raziskava prispeva k boljšemu razumevanju korozijskih uravnav in lahko pomaga pri njihovi identifikaciji in upravljanju v kraških območij.

show abstract

The usefulness of unsupervised classification methods for landscape typification: The case of Slovenia

Cited by 4 publications

References 28 publications

Landscape macrotypologies and microtypologies of Slovenia

Landscape macrotypologies and microtypologies of Slovenia

Think Pair Share Method as a Tool to Increase Student Interest and Learning Outcomes

Morphogenesis and classification of corrosion plains in Slovenia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About