2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of virtual screening and differential scanning fluorimetry for the rapid identification of fragments active against MEK1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 10 The library used for screening was designed by a target-restrained virtual screening campaign, so that a large number of binding fragments was expected. 11 The results presented here demonstrate that MST generates quantitative data for affinity rankings in a rapid and precise manner. Fourteen out of 19 fragments subjected to crystallization studies within the MST top-25 affinity ranking were shown to bind to MEK1 by X-ray crystallography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 10 The library used for screening was designed by a target-restrained virtual screening campaign, so that a large number of binding fragments was expected. 11 The results presented here demonstrate that MST generates quantitative data for affinity rankings in a rapid and precise manner. Fourteen out of 19 fragments subjected to crystallization studies within the MST top-25 affinity ranking were shown to bind to MEK1 by X-ray crystallography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The relatively high hit rate reflects the preselection of the library by virtual screen for fragments that specifically bind to the ATP binding cleft of MEK1. 11 The hit rate determined by MST is higher than those determined by other biophysical techniques for the same library on MEK1, highlighting the technique’s ability to identify a larger pool of chemical matter that could be explored at the start of a hit-to-lead process. From the 73 fragments that induced MST responses, 25 showed dose–response curves with clearly defined bound and unbound states and K d values of <200 µM, and were classified as best hits ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3234 It is ignored in the majority of cases by docking compounds strictly to a crystal structure, 3537 although there are examples that have used multiple crystal structures, 3840 NMR structures, 4144 or a combination of the two. 451,461 Albeit less common, the use of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to generate an ensemble of structures has also been reported in virtual screening efforts that have led to active compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual screening requires a minimum of two inputs, (1) a three-dimensional model of the ligand (drug), and (2) a three-dimensional model of the receptor (protein) [ 322 ], the latter generated from the atomic studies of proteins via X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy [ 323 ]. Virtual screening is not a truly “stand-alone” technique and has often been combined with additional biophysical techniques besides NMR spectroscopy and/or X-ray crystallography [ 324 ], such as differential scanning fluorimetry [ 325 ], fluorescence polarization, and surface plasmon resonance [ 324 ]. In this section, we briefly introduce how virtual screening has been combined with NMR spectroscopy, and how they are complementary approaches to each other in drug design.…”
Section: Nmr Methods For Drug Discovery and Drug Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%