1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00149.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of transgenic and naturally occurring mutants to understand and manipulate tomato fruit ripening

Abstract: In the years since we last reviewed the use of mutants to study tomato fruit ripening (Grierson et al. 1987), considerable information has been gained by the cloning, sequencing and identification of many mRNAs implicated in this developmental process. Genes involved in cell wall degradation, colour change and ethylene synthesis have been cloned, and antisense techniques have been developed and used to produce genetically engineered mutant fruit deficient in these aspects of ripening (see Gray et al. 1992). Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
2
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The alc (Mutschler 1984) and nor (Tigchelaar et al 1973) genes, which are known to influence the expression of several other genes throughout fruit ripening, including one for polygalacturonase (Kinzer et al 1990), are also located on chromosome 10. In addition, cDNAs associated with fruit ripening such as ERT1, ERT10 and ERT15 are linked to the polygalacturonase gene locus (Gray et al 1994). According to Giovannoni et al (1999), ERT10 and ERT15 are mapped next to the gene coding for polygalacturonase (PGAL), and the ERT1 gene is 19.9 cM distant from the gene l-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The alc (Mutschler 1984) and nor (Tigchelaar et al 1973) genes, which are known to influence the expression of several other genes throughout fruit ripening, including one for polygalacturonase (Kinzer et al 1990), are also located on chromosome 10. In addition, cDNAs associated with fruit ripening such as ERT1, ERT10 and ERT15 are linked to the polygalacturonase gene locus (Gray et al 1994). According to Giovannoni et al (1999), ERT10 and ERT15 are mapped next to the gene coding for polygalacturonase (PGAL), and the ERT1 gene is 19.9 cM distant from the gene l-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ripening of tomato fruit is characterized by a wide range of biochemical changes, including increase in respiration, ethylene synthesis, chlorophyll breakdown, accumulation of lycopene, decrease in organic acid and fruit softening (Gray et al 1994. In pleiotropic mutants, such as rin (ripening inhibitor), nor (non-ripening), Nr (Never ripe) and alc (alcobac¸a), the rates of these changes are drastically affected when compared with the pattern in non-mutant fruits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulation of the expression of these genes appears to be complex. By analyzing transgenic and natural tomato mutants with deficient ethylene production or perception, severa1 groups have recently shown that the induction of the ripening process is regulated by at least two different pathways in tomato fruit Gray et al, 1994;Yen et al, 1995).…”
Section: High Co Affects Both Ethylene-and Developmentdependent Cenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…How this pathway regulates the expression of ripening-related genes is still poorly understood (Gray et al, 1994;Zarembinski and Theologis, 1994). The expression of PG, which is involved in the degradation of cell wall polyuronides, and ACO is probably mediated via this pathway, although the posttranscriptional processing of the former is ethylenedependent (Theologis, 1992).…”
Section: High Co Affects Both Ethylene-and Developmentdependent Cenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the function of genes and their role in the ripening process, an antisense RNA strategy has been used by several research groups and several transgenic plants showing reduced expression of ripening related genes have been obtained (Gray et al, 1994;Stearns and Glick, 2003). Transgenic tomato plants expressing an antisense polygalacturonase gene showed a reduction in PG transcripts as well in enzymatic activity during ripening and it was has been shown that in fruits with antisense PG the degradation of cellular wall pectins was inhibited but other aspects of maturation, such as ethylene production and lycopene accumulation were not affected (Smith et al, 1990;Brummell and Harpster, 2001).…”
Section: Genetic Manipulation Of Fruit Ripeningmentioning
confidence: 99%